Mitral stenosis includes mitral stenosis due to rheumatic fever and non-rheumatic valve stenosis characterized by degenerative changes. Rheumatic mitral stenosis is common in developing countries and occurs in young adults, while degenerative mitral stenosis is common in developed countries and increases in incidence with aging. Mitral stenosis of different etiologies can lead to changes in heart structure and function, which affects the quality of life and prognosis of patients, so lifelong management of mitral stenosis is crucial. This article provides a comprehensive reference for clinicians in the management of mitral stenosis, with a detailed overview of the emerging prevalence features, imaging diagnosis, and treatment methods.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of mitral valve repair technique in the treatment of rheumatic mitral valve lesions. Methods The clinical data of patients diagnosed with rheumatic mitral valve lesions and undergoing mitral valve repair under extracorporeal circulation in our department from 2021 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 100 patients were collected, including 78 females and 22 males with an average age of 52 years. There were no secondary open heart or death in the whole group. Extracorporeal circulation time was 136.3±33.1 min, aortic cross-clamping time was 107.6±27.5 min, ventilator use time was 12.9±5.9 h, ICU stay was 2.6±1.4 d, and vasoactive medication use was 823.4±584.4 mg. Before and after the surgery, there were statistical differences in the left ventricular end diastolic diameter, left atrial end systolic diameter, effective mitral valve orifice area, shortening rate of left ventricular short axis, mitral E-peak blood flow velocity, mean mitral transvalvular pressure difference, mitral pressure half-time, and cardiac function graded by New York Heart Association (P＜0.05). While there was no statistical difference in left ventricular ejection fraction or left ventricular end-diastolic volume (P>0.05). Conclusion Overall repair of rheumatic mitral valve lesions can significantly improve the cardiac function and hemodynamics of the patients, and is a good choice for patients with rheumatic mitral valve lesions.
Rheumatic mitral stenosis is one of the most common cardiac valvulopathies in our country, which is relatively rare in European and American countries. Medical therapy is reserved mainly for the treatment of complications, which can not fundamentally change the valve structure. Only surgical treatments can correct these valve lesions, including closed mitral commissurotomy, percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty, mitral valve repair under direct vision and mitral valve replacement. Numerous studies demonstrate that valve repair provides better long-term results, though it occupies a low proportion clinically. This article reviewed domestic and foreign literature concerning surgical treatments for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis to provide some reference for the peers.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of early outcomes of mitral valvuloplasty (MVP)for the treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR). MethodsClinical data of 132 DMR patients who underwent MVP in Fu Wai Hospital between January 1, 2011 and November 1, 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 114 patients (86.4%)were followed up after discharge with their mean age of 51.21±12.78 years, including 76 males (66.7%). Preoperative risk factors of early outcomes of MVP were analyzed. ResultsAmong those patients, there were 25 patients with atrial fibri-llation (AF)(21.9%). Preoperative ejection fraction was 63.88%±6.93%. Preoperative echocardiography showed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD)was 31.61±5.51 mm/m2. There were 66 patients (57.9%)with tricuspid regurg-itation, and 34 patients (29.8%)underwent concomitant tricuspid valvuloplasty including 10 patients (8.8%)who received tricuspid annuloplasty rings. Two patients died postoperatively, 2 patients underwent re-operation of mitral valve replacement or MVP respectively. Postoperative echocardiography showed moderate or severe mitral regurgitation in 15 patients. Preoperative risk factors of early outcomes of MVP included AF (36.8% vs. 18.9%, P=0.035), large LVEDD (34.02±3.76 mm/m2 vs. 31.15±5.68 mm/m2, P=0.042)and functional mitral regurgitation (15.8% vs. 1.1%, P=0.007). Multivariate analysis showed greater postoperative LVEDD reduction significantly lowered the incidence of postoperative events (HR 0.002, 95% CI < 0.001-0.570, P=0.031). ConclusionsEnlargement of the left ventricle is an independent preoperative risk factor for early outcomes of MVP for DMR patients. Greater postoperative LVEDD reduction significantly lowers the incidence of postoperative events.
Minimally invasive cardiac surgeries are the trend in the future. Among them, robotic cardiac surgery is the latest iteration with several key-hole incision, 3-dimentional visualization, and articulated instrumentation of 7 degree of ergonomic freedom for those complex procedures in the heart. In particular, robotic mitral valve surgery, as well as coronary artery bypass grafting, has evolved over the last decade and become the preferred method at certain specialized centers worldwide because of excellent results. Other cardiac procedures are in various stages of evolution. Stepwise innovation of robotic technology will continue to make robotic operations simpler, more efficient, and less invasive, which will encourage more surgeons to take up this technology and extend the benefits of robotic surgery to a larger patient population.
Objective To investigate the correlation between the left atrial hydrodynamic change and atrial fibrillation (AF) in the patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Methods According to cardiac rhythm before operation, 49 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis accompanying chronic AF were divided into two groups,group A: AF, 25 cases; group B: sinus rhythm, 24 cases. Control group : 29 healthy volunteers were examined. By using echocardiography, left atrial hydrodynamics were tested, and repeated 6-8 months after the operation. Results Left atrial stress (LAS), left atriala area (LAA) and left atrial volume(LAV) in group A after operation was much lower than before operation, LAS after operation in group B was also lower than before operation(Plt;0.01). Before operation, LAS in group A was significantly lower than that in group B, LAA and LAVwere larger. After operation, LAA and LAV in group A were significantly larger than those in group B(Plt;0.01). LAS, LAA and LAV in group A and group B before and after operation were higher than those in control group. Conclusion Left atrial hydrodynamic enviroment in patients with mitral stenosis has not reached normal even after valve replacement, LAS may be an important factor of causing AF.