• 1.Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R.China. 2. Department of Pharmacy, The Electric Worker’s Hospital of Guizhou, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002, P.R.China;
TANG Yao, Email: binw83@yahoo.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

【摘要】 目的  評價腎移植術后他克莫司(TAC)低劑量對比常規劑量干預的療效和安全性。 方法  檢索MEDLINE、EMbase、SCI、CBM、Cochrane圖書館,納入腎移植術后TAC低劑量對比常規劑量免疫抑制治療的隨機對照試驗(RCT)。檢索時間從各個數據庫建庫至2009年12月,對納入研究進行方法學質量評價和Meta分析。 結果  納入3個RCT,其中A級研究2個,B級研究1個。分析結果顯示:兩組急性排斥反應發生率比較,無統計學意義[RR=1.39, 95%CI(0.64, 3.01)];腎小球濾過率、受者/移植物生存率和納入分析的安全性指標差異均無統計學意義。 結論  基于當前臨床證據,腎移植術后TAC低劑量與常規劑量干預相比,近期療效和安全性相似;遠期結果尚需進一步研究探討。
【Abstract】 Objective  To evaluate the effect and safety of low-dose versus standard-dose tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy on kidney transplant recipients. Methods  MEDLINE, EMbase, SCI, CBM and the Cochrane library were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCT) of low-dose versus standard-dose tacrolimus immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients were gathered. The search was updated in December 2009. Quality assessment and meta-analysis were performed. Results  A total of three RCT were identified, two of which were graded A and one was graded B. The analysis results indicated that RR (95%CI) value of the acute rejection rate was 1.39 (0.64, 3.01); glomerular filtration rate, patient/graft survival rate, and safety analysis were not significant different between the two groups. Conclusion  Based on the evidence currently, compared to standard-dose TAC, Low-dose TAC has the same effect and safety results, but further study are needed to get the long term results.

Citation: WU Bin,LU Jing,CHEN Yunxi,TANG Yao. A Meta Analysis of Low-Dose Tacrolimus Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients. West China Medical Journal, 2010, 25(10): 1857-1859. doi: Copy

Copyright ? the editorial department of West China Medical Journal of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved