1. |
Pratim RP. ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Inter Things Cyber-Phy Sys, 2023, 3: 121-154.
|
2. |
Loh E. ChatGPT and generative AI chatbots: challenges and opportunities for science, medicine and medical leaders. BMJ Lead, 2023, 5: leader-2023-000797.2023r-2797r.
|
3. |
Dave T, Athaluri SA, Singh S. ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations. Front Artif Intell, 2023, 6: 1169595.
|
4. |
馬武仁, 弓孟春, 戴輝, 等. 以ChatGPT為代表的大語言模型在臨床醫學中的應用綜述. 醫學信息學雜志, 2023, 44(7): 9-17.
|
5. |
徐璐璐, 洪贇, 葉鷹. ChatGPT及GPT類技術的醫學信息學應用前景探討. 情報理論與實踐, 2023, 46(6): 38-42.
|
6. |
Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled. Ann Intern Med, 1996, 125(7): 605-613.
|
7. |
Wei Y, Guo X. Revolutionizing clinical experimental protocol design through the ChatGPT technology. Am J Med Sci, 2023, 366(6): 468-470.
|
8. |
Peikos G, Symeonidis S, Kasela P, et al. Utilizing ChatGPT to enhance clinical trial enrollment. arXiv preprint, 2023, 6: arXiv: 2306.02077.
|
9. |
Methnani J, Latiri I, Dergaa I, et al. ChatGPT for sample-size calculation in sports medicine and exercise sciences: a cautionary note. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 2023, 18(10): 1219-1223.
|
10. |
Hernandez AF, Lindsell CJ. The future of clinical trials: artificial to augmented to applied intelligence. JAMA, 2023, 330(21): 2061-2063.
|
11. |
Hassani H, Silva ES. The role of ChatGPT in data science: how AI-assisted conversational interfaces are revolutionizing the field. Big Data Cogn Comput, 2023, 7(2): 62.
|
12. |
Sanmarchi F, Bucci A, Nuzzolese AG, et al. A step-by-step researcher's guide to the use of an AI-based transformer in epidemiology: an exploratory analysis of ChatGPT using the STROBE checklist for observational studies. Z Gesundh Wiss, 2023, 5: 1-36.
|
13. |
Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J, et al. A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol, 2020, 35(1): 49-60.
|
14. |
Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV. How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol, 2019, 70: 747-770.
|
15. |
Tawfik GM, Dila KAS, Mohamed MYF, et al. A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Trop Med Health, 2019, 47: 46.
|
16. |
Mahuli SA, Rai A, Mahuli AV, et al. Application ChatGPT in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Br Dent J, 2023, 235(2): 90-92.
|
17. |
Qureshi R, Shaughnessy D, Gill KAR, et al. Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation. Syst Rev, 2023, 12(1): 72.
|
18. |
van Dijk SHB, Brusse-Keizer MGJ, Bucsán CC, et al. Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(7): e072254.
|
19. |
Atkinson CF. Cheap, quick, and rigorous: artificial intelligence and the systematic literature review. Social Sci Comp Review, 2023: 08944393231196281.
|
20. |
陳潤生. 醫療大數據結合大語言模型的應用展望. 四川大學學報(醫學版), 2023, 54(5): 855-856.
|
21. |
Scott AM, Glasziou P, Clark J. We extended the 2-week systematic review (2 week SR) methodology to larger, more complex systematic reviews: a case series. J Clin Epidemiol, 2023, 5(157): 112-119.
|
22. |
Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Am J Cancer Res, 2023, 13(4): 1148-1154.
|
23. |
Alshami A, Elsayed M, Ali E, et al. Harnessing the power of ChatGPT for automating systematic review process: methodology, case study, limitations, and future directions. Systems, 2023, 11(7): 351.
|
24. |
Marshall IJ, Kuiper J, Wallace BC. RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2016, 23(1): 193-201.
|
25. |
Kim SG. Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2023, 45(1): 13.
|
26. |
Gao CA, Howard FM, Markov NS, et al. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. NPJ Digit Med, 2023, 6(1): 75.
|
27. |
Kim JK, Chua M, Rickard M, et al. ChatGPT and large language model (LLM) chatbots: The current state of acceptability and a proposal for guidelines on utilization in academic medicine. J Pediatr Urol, 2023, 19(5): 598-604.
|
28. |
Nuzula IF, Amri MM. Will ChatGPT bring a new paradigm to HR world. A critical opinion article. J Manage Stud Devel, 2023, 2(2): 142-161.
|
29. |
Peng Y, Rousseau JF, Shortliffe EH, et al. AI-generated text may have a role in evidence-based medicine. Nat Med, 2023, 29(7): 1593-1594.
|
30. |
Higgins JP, Altman DG, G?tzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 2011, 343: d5928.
|
31. |
Sterne JAC, Savovi? J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 2019, 366: l4898.
|
32. |
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 2010, 340: c332.
|
33. |
Pitre T, Jassal T, Talukdar JR, et al. ChatGPT for assessing risk of bias of randomized trials using the RoB 2.0 tool: a methods study. medRxiv preprint, 2023.
|
34. |
Roberts RH, Ali SR, Hutchings HA, et al. Comparative study of ChatGPT and human evaluators on the assessment of medical literature according to recognised reporting standards. BMJ Health Care Inform, 2023, 30(1): e100830.
|
35. |
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press, 2011.
|
36. |
Lahat A, Shachar E, Avidan B, et al. Evaluating the use of large language model in identifying top research questions in gastroenterology. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 4164.
|
37. |
Serj Hunt. Use ChatGPT to find contact details of experts in any topic. Youtube, 2024.
|
38. |
The New York Times. Do you have a conflict of interest? This robotic assistant may find it first. The New York Times, 2020.
|
39. |
Sohail SS, Madsen D?, Himeur Y, et al. Using ChatGPT to navigate ambivalent and contradictory research findings on artificial intelligence. Front Artif Intell, 2023, 6: 1195797.
|
40. |
Hamed E, Eid A, Alberry M. Exploring ChatGPT's potential in facilitating adaptation of clinical guidelines: a case study of diabetic ketoacidosis guidelines. Cureus, 2023, 15(5): e38784.
|
41. |
Haverkamp W, Tennenbaum J, Strodthoff N. ChatGPT fails the test of evidence-based medicine. Eur Heart J Digit Health, 2023, 4(5): 366-367.
|
42. |
Gaggioli A. Ethics: disclose use of AI in scientific manuscripts. Nature, 2023, 614(7948): 413.
|
43. |
Ali K, Barhom N, Tamimi F, et al. ChatGPT-A double-edged sword for healthcare education. Implications for assessments of dental students. Eur J Dent Educ, 2024, 28(1): 206-211.
|
44. |
Palal D, Ghonge S, Jadav V, et al. ChatGPT: a double-edged sword? Health Serv Insights, 2023, 16: 11786329231174338.
|
45. |
Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, et al. ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology, 2023, 307(2): e230163.
|
46. |
Cacciamani GE, Collins GS, Gill IS. ChatGPT: standard reporting guidelines for responsible use. Nature, 2023, 618(7964): 238.
|
47. |
Huo B, Cacciamani GE, Collins GS, et al. Reporting standards for the use of large language model-linked chatbots for health advice. Nat Med, 2023, 29(12): 2988.
|
48. |
Luo X, Estill J, Chen Y. The use of ChatGPT in medical research: do we need a reporting guideline. Int J Surg, 2023, 109(12): 3750-3751.
|
49. |
李佩芳, 陳佳麗, 寧寧, 等. ChatGPT在醫學領域的應用進展及思考. 華西醫學, 2023, 38(10): 1456-1460.
|