SCI papers of West China Hospital of Sichuan University cited by guidelines: a cross-sectional study_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

TANG Ruixian ^1,2 , LONG Youlin ^1,2,3 , ZHANG Na ^1,2,3 , WANG Xinyao ^1,2,3 , WANG Xinyi ^1,2 , GUO Qiong ⁴ , DU Liang ^2,3,4 ,  LI Zhengchi ⁵ ,  WANG Zheng ⁶

1. General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
2. Medical Device Regulatory Research and Evaluation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
3. Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
4. West China Periodical Press, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
5. CPC Committee Office, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
6. Department of Science and Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

LI Zhengchi, Email: 603172078@qq.com; WANG Zheng, Email: wangzh028@163.com

Keywords：

Guideline citation; Cross-sectional study; Article; Systematic review; Review

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202308076

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To understand the guideline citation of papers published by West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and to provide references for evaluating quality of papers. Methods We searched Web of Science core collection database to identify the published papers with the first author's primary affiliation at West China Hospital of Sichuan University until December 31^st, 2022. Two reviewers independently performed the screening process and identified eligible papers. Afterward, we extracted the data from the selected papers, obtained their citation papers, and then separately constructed two databases, the West China Paper Database and its Citation Database. The differences in guideline citation among different types of papers and different levels of papers were analyzed using the χ² test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Results A total of 22 681 papers and 252 336 citations were included, of which 18 026 (79.5) articles, 2 773 (12.2) systematic reviews and 1 882 (8.3) reviews. The rates of article, systematic review and review were 2.6%, 15.8% and 2.2%, respectively. There were significant differences in three types (P<0.001). The citation rates of papers among the top 10 disciplines were different apparently: the highest citation rate was 13.9%, while the lowest citation rate was 2.6%. The guideline citation among different levels of papers showed no significant difference, but Q1 papers were more likely to be cited by Q1 guidelines (P<0.05). Conclusion Papers cited by guidelines are unevenly distributed across their article types and subject areas. High-quality papers are more likely to be cited by high-quality guidelines. Therefore, the citation of papers by guidelines can be considered as one of the indicators to evaluate the quality of papers.

Citation： TANG Ruixian, LONG Youlin, ZHANG Na, WANG Xinyao, WANG Xinyi, GUO Qiong, DU Liang, LI Zhengchi, WANG Zheng. SCI papers of West China Hospital of Sichuan University cited by guidelines: a cross-sectional study. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 24(2): 149-154. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202308076 Copy

1.	江瀾, 關衛屏, 游蘇寧. 應將論文被引用頻次作為未來科研成果評價的指標. 中華醫學雜志, 2009, 89(24): 1727-1728.
2.	Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C. How can we assess scientific quality. Citation index only for original research and/or for authorship in the guidelines? Hellenic J Cardiol, 2014, 55(5): 353-354.
3.	董建軍. 中國知網收錄的國家自然科學基金論文的被引情況分析. 中國科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(5): 776-778.
4.	劉雪立, 方紅玲, 周志新, 等. 科技期刊反向評價指標—零被引論文率及其與其他文獻計量學指標的關系. 中國科技期刊研究, 2011, 22(4): 525-528.
5.	俞立平, 潘云濤, 武夷山. 學術期刊來源指標與影響力關系的實證研究. 科研管理, 2010, 31(6): 173-179.
6.	Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 2009, 57(1): 13-18.
7.	Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
8.	Braun TGW, Schubert A. World flash on basic research - the newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 100 countries 1981-1985. Sci entometrics, 1988, 13: 181-188.
9.	科技部. 印發《關于破除科技評價中“唯論文”不良導向的若干措施(試行)》的通知. 2020.
10.	Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Impact assessment framework and recommended indicators. 2023.
11.	The World University Rankings. The impact rankings 2020: methodology.
12.	中國醫學科學院醫學信息研究所. 中國醫院/醫學院校科技量值. 2023.
13.	Medical Research Council. Researchfish database of MRC outcome. 2023.
14.	胥美美, 單連慧, 安新穎. 基于國際臨床指南引用論文的中國研究影響力評價—以呼吸病學為例. 情報工程, 2022, 8(1): 111-121.
15.	Wang X, Chen Y, Yang N, et al. Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMC Med Res Method, 2015, 15(1): 74.
16.	Zhang S, Wu L, Wang Y, et al. Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Ann Trans Med, 2021, 9(15): 1258.
17.	四川大學華西醫院. 四川大學華西醫院科技成果轉移轉化九條激勵政策(試行). 2023.
18.	四川大學華西醫院. 四川大學華西醫院科學研究. 2023.
19.	朱曉燕, 王旭, 陶瑩, 等. 上海市專科醫院臨床研究人才隊伍建設存在的問題及對策研究. 上海預防醫學, 2021, 33(12): 1209-1214.
20.	晏艷陽, 王娟. 產業政策如何促進企業創新效率提升—對“五年規劃”實施效果的一項評價. 產經評論, 2018, 9(3): 57-74.
21.	程國輝. 加強基礎研究投入, 為經濟注入“強心針”. 科學導報, 2015.
22.	中國知網. 公立醫院高質量發展背景下華西醫院科研管理體系建設. 2023.
23.	陶斯宇, 譚宗穎. 生物醫學領域基礎研究轉化的測度方法研究—以干細胞和免疫學領域國家自然科學基金資助面上項目產出論文為例. 圖書情報工作, 2023, 67(14): 50-61.
24.	Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US), 2011.
25.	王夢書, 李樂, 張紅霞, 等. 影像診斷系統評價被臨床實踐指南引用情況調查. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2016, 16(3): 341-347.

1. 江瀾, 關衛屏, 游蘇寧. 應將論文被引用頻次作為未來科研成果評價的指標. 中華醫學雜志, 2009, 89(24): 1727-1728.
2. Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C. How can we assess scientific quality. Citation index only for original research and/or for authorship in the guidelines? Hellenic J Cardiol, 2014, 55(5): 353-354.
3. 董建軍. 中國知網收錄的國家自然科學基金論文的被引情況分析. 中國科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(5): 776-778.
4. 劉雪立, 方紅玲, 周志新, 等. 科技期刊反向評價指標—零被引論文率及其與其他文獻計量學指標的關系. 中國科技期刊研究, 2011, 22(4): 525-528.
5. 俞立平, 潘云濤, 武夷山. 學術期刊來源指標與影響力關系的實證研究. 科研管理, 2010, 31(6): 173-179.
6. Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 2009, 57(1): 13-18.
7. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
8. Braun TGW, Schubert A. World flash on basic research - the newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 100 countries 1981-1985. Sci entometrics, 1988, 13: 181-188.
9. 科技部. 印發《關于破除科技評價中“唯論文”不良導向的若干措施(試行)》的通知. 2020.
10. Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Impact assessment framework and recommended indicators. 2023.
11. The World University Rankings. The impact rankings 2020: methodology.
12. 中國醫學科學院醫學信息研究所. 中國醫院/醫學院校科技量值. 2023.
13. Medical Research Council. Researchfish database of MRC outcome. 2023.
14. 胥美美, 單連慧, 安新穎. 基于國際臨床指南引用論文的中國研究影響力評價—以呼吸病學為例. 情報工程, 2022, 8(1): 111-121.
15. Wang X, Chen Y, Yang N, et al. Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMC Med Res Method, 2015, 15(1): 74.
16. Zhang S, Wu L, Wang Y, et al. Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Ann Trans Med, 2021, 9(15): 1258.
17. 四川大學華西醫院. 四川大學華西醫院科技成果轉移轉化九條激勵政策(試行). 2023.
18. 四川大學華西醫院. 四川大學華西醫院科學研究. 2023.
19. 朱曉燕, 王旭, 陶瑩, 等. 上海市專科醫院臨床研究人才隊伍建設存在的問題及對策研究. 上海預防醫學, 2021, 33(12): 1209-1214.
20. 晏艷陽, 王娟. 產業政策如何促進企業創新效率提升—對“五年規劃”實施效果的一項評價. 產經評論, 2018, 9(3): 57-74.
21. 程國輝. 加強基礎研究投入, 為經濟注入“強心針”. 科學導報, 2015.
22. 中國知網. 公立醫院高質量發展背景下華西醫院科研管理體系建設. 2023.
23. 陶斯宇, 譚宗穎. 生物醫學領域基礎研究轉化的測度方法研究—以干細胞和免疫學領域國家自然科學基金資助面上項目產出論文為例. 圖書情報工作, 2023, 67(14): 50-61.
24. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US), 2011.
25. 王夢書, 李樂, 張紅霞, 等. 影像診斷系統評價被臨床實踐指南引用情況調查. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2016, 16(3): 341-347.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

SCI papers of West China Hospital of Sichuan University cited by guidelines: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content