Effect of clamping catheter and free drainage for patients with neurogenic bladder with indwelling catheter: a meta-analysis_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

ZHU Liang ^1,2 , PAN Hongxia ^1,2 ,  ZHANG Jianmei ^1,2 , HU Jingwen ^1,2 , DU Chunping ^1,2 , WEI Quan ^1,2

1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
2. Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

ZHANG Jianmei, Email: zhangjianmei2009@qq.com

Keywords：

Neurogenic bladder dysfunction; Indwelling urinary catheter; Clamping catheter; Free drainage; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202210118

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To systematically review the effect of clamping catheter and free drainage for patients with neurogenic bladder with indwelling catheter. Methods The PubMed, EMbase, CINAHL, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objects from inception to January 8, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 7 RCTs involving 586 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that clamping catheter significantly reduced time of first void (SMD=?1.03, 95%CI ?1.71 to ?0.36, P=0.03) and increased volume of first void (MD=52.72, 95%CI 28.84 to 76.59, P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in residual urine volume, incidence of urinary retention or urinary tract infection between the two groups. Conclusion Current evidence shows that the advantage of clamping catheter for patients with neurogenic bladder with indwelling catheter is not obvious. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.

Citation： ZHU Liang, PAN Hongxia, ZHANG Jianmei, HU Jingwen, DU Chunping, WEI Quan. Effect of clamping catheter and free drainage for patients with neurogenic bladder with indwelling catheter: a meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(4): 422-425. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202210118 Copy

1.	McDonough RC, Ryan ST. Diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Surg Clin North Am, 2016, 96(3): 441-452.
2.	Manack A, Motsko SP, Haag-Molkenteller C, et al. Epidemiology and healthcare utilization of neurogenic bladder patients in a US claims database. Neurourol Urodyn, 2011, 30(3): 395-401.
3.	Roe B. Do we need to clamp catheters. Nursing times, 1990, 86(43): 66-67.
4.	中國康復醫學會康復護理專業委員會. 神經源性膀胱護理實踐指南(2017年版). 護理學雜志, 2017, 32(24): 1-7.
5.	Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Tate DG, et al. Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005. J Urol, 2010, 184(1): 213-217.
6.	Zhengyong Y, Changxiao H, Shibing Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with acute urinary retention associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scand J Urol, 2014, 48(4): 400-404.
7.	Ross J. Some observations on the indwelling catheter. Practitioner, 1936, 136: 638-644.
8.	胡曉昀, 李秀萍, 方海云, 等. 術后短期留置尿管患者拔管前夾閉尿管必要性的研究. 中華護理雜志, 2013, 48(3): 269-270.
9.	Crowe H, Clift R, Duggan G, et al. A randomized study of the effect of midnight removal of urinary catheters. Urol Nurs, 1994, 14(1): 18-20.
10.	Wilde MH, McDonald MV, Brasch J, et al. Long-term urinary catheter users self-care practices and problems. J Clin Nurs, 2013, 22(3-4): 356-367.
11.	王舒蓉, 楊海玲, 姜素蘭. 夾管訓練結合膀胱功能康復訓練對老年腦出血神經源性膀胱患者排尿功能及生活質量的影響. 老年醫學與保健, 2021, 27(5): 969-972,1028.
12.	Fanfani F, Costantini B, Mascilini F, et al. Early postoperative bladder training in patients submitted to radical hysterectomy: is it still necessary. A randomized trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 291(4): 883-888.
13.	Liu YS, Wei S, Elliott M. The effects of a catheter clamping protocol on bladder function in neurosurgical patients: a controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract, 2015, 21(1): 29-36.
14.	Guzmán S, Israel E, Puente R, et al. Handling of Foley catheter regarding urinary retention syndrome following vaginal surgery. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol, 1994, 59(4): 280-283.
15.	Oberst MT, Graham D, Geller NL, et al. Catheter management programs and postoperative urinary dysfunction. Res Nurs Health, 1981, 4(1): 175-181.
16.	Moon HJ, Chun MH, Lee SJ, et al. The usefulness of bladder reconditioning before indwelling urethral catheter removal from stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 91(8): 681-688.
17.	Wahyu H. The influence of bladder training initiation on residual urine in the stroke patients with urine catheter. Nurs Med J Nurs, 2011, 2011: 255-264.
18.	NHSN Training, CDC. Patient safety component (PSC) manual. Urinary tract infection [catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and non-catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) and other urinary system infection (USI)] events. Chapter 7: device-associated module. Atlanta: CDC, 2022: 1-13.
19.	Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, et al. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010, 31(4): 319-326.
20.	Fernandez RS, Griffiths RD. Clamping short-term indwelling catheters: a systematic review of the evidence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2005, 32(5): 329-336.
21.	Ellahi A, Stewart F, Kidd EA, et al. Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, (6): CD004011.
22.	Fillingham S, Douglas J. Urological nursing (3rd ed). London: Bailliere Tindall, 2005: 1.
23.	European Association of Urology Nurses. Catheterisation: indwelling catheters in adults-urethral and suprapubic 2012.
24.	European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urological infections 2015.

1. McDonough RC, Ryan ST. Diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Surg Clin North Am, 2016, 96(3): 441-452.
2. Manack A, Motsko SP, Haag-Molkenteller C, et al. Epidemiology and healthcare utilization of neurogenic bladder patients in a US claims database. Neurourol Urodyn, 2011, 30(3): 395-401.
3. Roe B. Do we need to clamp catheters. Nursing times, 1990, 86(43): 66-67.
4. 中國康復醫學會康復護理專業委員會. 神經源性膀胱護理實踐指南(2017年版). 護理學雜志, 2017, 32(24): 1-7.
5. Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Tate DG, et al. Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005. J Urol, 2010, 184(1): 213-217.
6. Zhengyong Y, Changxiao H, Shibing Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with acute urinary retention associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scand J Urol, 2014, 48(4): 400-404.
7. Ross J. Some observations on the indwelling catheter. Practitioner, 1936, 136: 638-644.
8. 胡曉昀, 李秀萍, 方海云, 等. 術后短期留置尿管患者拔管前夾閉尿管必要性的研究. 中華護理雜志, 2013, 48(3): 269-270.
9. Crowe H, Clift R, Duggan G, et al. A randomized study of the effect of midnight removal of urinary catheters. Urol Nurs, 1994, 14(1): 18-20.
10. Wilde MH, McDonald MV, Brasch J, et al. Long-term urinary catheter users self-care practices and problems. J Clin Nurs, 2013, 22(3-4): 356-367.
11. 王舒蓉, 楊海玲, 姜素蘭. 夾管訓練結合膀胱功能康復訓練對老年腦出血神經源性膀胱患者排尿功能及生活質量的影響. 老年醫學與保健, 2021, 27(5): 969-972,1028.
12. Fanfani F, Costantini B, Mascilini F, et al. Early postoperative bladder training in patients submitted to radical hysterectomy: is it still necessary. A randomized trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 291(4): 883-888.
13. Liu YS, Wei S, Elliott M. The effects of a catheter clamping protocol on bladder function in neurosurgical patients: a controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract, 2015, 21(1): 29-36.
14. Guzmán S, Israel E, Puente R, et al. Handling of Foley catheter regarding urinary retention syndrome following vaginal surgery. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol, 1994, 59(4): 280-283.
15. Oberst MT, Graham D, Geller NL, et al. Catheter management programs and postoperative urinary dysfunction. Res Nurs Health, 1981, 4(1): 175-181.
16. Moon HJ, Chun MH, Lee SJ, et al. The usefulness of bladder reconditioning before indwelling urethral catheter removal from stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 91(8): 681-688.
17. Wahyu H. The influence of bladder training initiation on residual urine in the stroke patients with urine catheter. Nurs Med J Nurs, 2011, 2011: 255-264.
18. NHSN Training, CDC. Patient safety component (PSC) manual. Urinary tract infection [catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and non-catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) and other urinary system infection (USI)] events. Chapter 7: device-associated module. Atlanta: CDC, 2022: 1-13.
19. Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, et al. Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010, 31(4): 319-326.
20. Fernandez RS, Griffiths RD. Clamping short-term indwelling catheters: a systematic review of the evidence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2005, 32(5): 329-336.
21. Ellahi A, Stewart F, Kidd EA, et al. Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, (6): CD004011.
22. Fillingham S, Douglas J. Urological nursing (3rd ed). London: Bailliere Tindall, 2005: 1.
23. European Association of Urology Nurses. Catheterisation: indwelling catheters in adults-urethral and suprapubic 2012.
24. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urological infections 2015.

Previous Article
Effect of oral vitamin D on cognitive function: a meta-analysis
Next Article
Research status of dementia in UK Biobank database based on bibliometric

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Effect of clamping catheter and free drainage for patients with neurogenic bladder with indwelling catheter: a meta-analysis

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content