Pay-for-performance for primary care physicians: a systematic review_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

GAO Linhui ^1,2 , ZANG Sujie ³ , MENG Qingyue ⁴ , Anthony Scott ⁵ , YUAN Beibei ⁴ , ZHANG Lu ⁶ ,  JIA Liying ^1,2

1. Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, P.R.China;
2. NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan 250012, P.R.China;
3. The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, P.R.China;
4. China Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS), Peking University, Beijing 100191, P.R.China;
5. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
6. Weihai Health Care Security Administration, Weihai 264500, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

JIA Liying, Email: lyjia@sdu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Pay for performance; Payment; Primary care physician; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202107170

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To systematically review the efficacy of pay-for-performance (P4P) for primary care physicians (PCPs). Methods The Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, EMbase, Web of Science, PubMed, Dissertations and Theses Database, EconLit, CNKI, WanFang Data, IDEAS, and POPLINE were searched to collect studies on the efficacy of P4P for PCPs from inception to May 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Statistical analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 10 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that P4P incentives possibly improved child immunization status (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.19 to 1.36, P<0.001), slightly improved primary care physicians’ prescribing of guideline-recommended antihypertensive medicines compared with existing payment method (RR=1.07, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.12, P=0.006), and improved a mixed outcome measure of service provision and patient health outcomes (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.23, P=0.004). Conclusions Current evidence shows that P4P possibly increases the quantity of health service provision and improve quality of service provision for targeted populations. The effects of P4P on health outcomes is uncertain. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.

Citation： GAO Linhui, ZANG Sujie, MENG Qingyue, Anthony Scott, YUAN Beibei, ZHANG Lu, JIA Liying. Pay-for-performance for primary care physicians: a systematic review. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(11): 1308-1315. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202107170 Copy

1.	Jia L, Meng Q, Scott A, et al. Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, (1): CD011865.
2.	袁蓓蓓, 何莉, 孟慶躍, 等. 按績效支付方式對門診服務機構績效的效果評價. 中國衛生政策研究, 2017, 10(9): 8-21.
3.	Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). What study designs can be considered for inclusion in an EPOC review and what should they be called? Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5106085.
4.	Collins E, Katona C, Orrell M. Management of depression in the elderly by general practitioners: II. Attitudes to ageing and factors affecting practice. Fam Pract, 1995, 12(1): 12-17.
5.	Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 6.2) . Available at:https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.
6.	Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. Available at:https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/suggested_risk_of_bias_criteria_for_epoc_reviews.pdf.
7.	Fairbrother G, Hanson KL, Friedman S, et al. The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health, 1999, 89(2): 171-175.
8.	Fairbrother G, Siegel MJ, Friedman S, et al. Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ambul Pediatr, 2001, 1(4): 206-212.
9.	Petersen LA, Simpson K, Pietz K, et al. Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2013, 310(10): 1042-1050.
10.	Chung S, Palaniappan L, Wong E, et al. Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter. -Experience from a randomized trial. Health Serv Res, 2010, 45(2): 553-564.
11.	Gleeson S, Kelleher K, Gardner W. Evaluating a pay-for-performance program for medicaid children in an accountable care organization. JAMA Pediatr, 2016, 170(3): 259-266.
12.	Greene J. An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia. Health Serv Res, 2013, 48(4): 1415-1432.
13.	Lee TT, Cheng SH, Chen CC, et al. A pay-for-performance program for diabetes care in Taiwan: a preliminary assessment. Am J Manag Care, 2010, 16(1): 65-69.
14.	Li J, Hurley J, DeCicca P, et al. Physician response to pay-for-performance: evidence from a natural experiment. Health Econ, 2014, 23(8): 962-978.
15.	Young GJ, Meterko M, Beckman H, et al. Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality. J Gen Intern Med, 2007, 22(6): 872-876.
16.	Young GJ, Beckman H, Baker E. Financial incentives, professional values and performance: a study of pay-for-performance in a professional organization. J Organiz Behav, 2012, 33(7): 964-983.
17.	杜會征, 黑蘊紅, 龍玉其. 北京市基本醫療保險支付方式改革的問題及對策. 臨床醫藥實踐, 2019, 28(7): 557-560.
18.	張馨元, 韓優莉, 薄云鵲, 等. 由后付制向預付制轉變對醫生行為影響的實驗研究. 中國衛生經濟, 2020, 39(4): 28-32.
19.	吳姝德. 基于績效考核的全科醫生團隊薪酬激勵機制研究. 武漢: 華中科技大學, 2016.
20.	朱曉麗, 代濤, 黃菊. 若干歐洲國家全科醫生支付方式演變及啟示. 醫學與哲學, 2017, 38(7): 56-59.
21.	Scott A, Sivey P, Ait Ouakrim D, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, (9): CD008451.
22.	Witter S, Fretheim A, Kessy FL, et al. Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, (2): CD007899.
23.	Flodgren G, Eccles MP, Shepperd S, et al. An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, (7): CD009255.
24.	賈莉英, 袁蓓蓓, 王健, 等. 衛生政策系統評價方法探討. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2009, 9(10): 1037-1043.
25.	賈莉英. 衛生政策系統綜述方法研制與實例研究. 濟南: 山東大學, 2009.

1. Jia L, Meng Q, Scott A, et al. Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2021, (1): CD011865.
2. 袁蓓蓓, 何莉, 孟慶躍, 等. 按績效支付方式對門診服務機構績效的效果評價. 中國衛生政策研究, 2017, 10(9): 8-21.
3. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). What study designs can be considered for inclusion in an EPOC review and what should they be called? Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5106085.
4. Collins E, Katona C, Orrell M. Management of depression in the elderly by general practitioners: II. Attitudes to ageing and factors affecting practice. Fam Pract, 1995, 12(1): 12-17.
5. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (version 6.2) . Available at:https://training.cochrane.org/handbook.
6. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC). Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. Available at:https://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/Resources-for-authors2017/suggested_risk_of_bias_criteria_for_epoc_reviews.pdf.
7. Fairbrother G, Hanson KL, Friedman S, et al. The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health, 1999, 89(2): 171-175.
8. Fairbrother G, Siegel MJ, Friedman S, et al. Impact of financial incentives on documented immunization rates in the inner city: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ambul Pediatr, 2001, 1(4): 206-212.
9. Petersen LA, Simpson K, Pietz K, et al. Effects of individual physician-level and practice-level financial incentives on hypertension care: a randomized trial. JAMA, 2013, 310(10): 1042-1050.
10. Chung S, Palaniappan L, Wong E, et al. Does the frequency of pay-for-performance payment matter. -Experience from a randomized trial. Health Serv Res, 2010, 45(2): 553-564.
11. Gleeson S, Kelleher K, Gardner W. Evaluating a pay-for-performance program for medicaid children in an accountable care organization. JAMA Pediatr, 2016, 170(3): 259-266.
12. Greene J. An examination of pay-for-performance in general practice in Australia. Health Serv Res, 2013, 48(4): 1415-1432.
13. Lee TT, Cheng SH, Chen CC, et al. A pay-for-performance program for diabetes care in Taiwan: a preliminary assessment. Am J Manag Care, 2010, 16(1): 65-69.
14. Li J, Hurley J, DeCicca P, et al. Physician response to pay-for-performance: evidence from a natural experiment. Health Econ, 2014, 23(8): 962-978.
15. Young GJ, Meterko M, Beckman H, et al. Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality. J Gen Intern Med, 2007, 22(6): 872-876.
16. Young GJ, Beckman H, Baker E. Financial incentives, professional values and performance: a study of pay-for-performance in a professional organization. J Organiz Behav, 2012, 33(7): 964-983.
17. 杜會征, 黑蘊紅, 龍玉其. 北京市基本醫療保險支付方式改革的問題及對策. 臨床醫藥實踐, 2019, 28(7): 557-560.
18. 張馨元, 韓優莉, 薄云鵲, 等. 由后付制向預付制轉變對醫生行為影響的實驗研究. 中國衛生經濟, 2020, 39(4): 28-32.
19. 吳姝德. 基于績效考核的全科醫生團隊薪酬激勵機制研究. 武漢: 華中科技大學, 2016.
20. 朱曉麗, 代濤, 黃菊. 若干歐洲國家全科醫生支付方式演變及啟示. 醫學與哲學, 2017, 38(7): 56-59.
21. Scott A, Sivey P, Ait Ouakrim D, et al. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, (9): CD008451.
22. Witter S, Fretheim A, Kessy FL, et al. Paying for performance to improve the delivery of health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, (2): CD007899.
23. Flodgren G, Eccles MP, Shepperd S, et al. An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, (7): CD009255.
24. 賈莉英, 袁蓓蓓, 王健, 等. 衛生政策系統評價方法探討. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2009, 9(10): 1037-1043.
25. 賈莉英. 衛生政策系統綜述方法研制與實例研究. 濟南: 山東大學, 2009.

Previous Article
Mortaligy risk prediction models for acute type A aortic dissection: a systematic review
Next Article
Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in China: a meta-analysis

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Pay-for-performance for primary care physicians: a systematic review

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content