Evaluation of reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

ZHOU Yingfeng ¹ ,  WANG Qiang ² ,  HU Yan ¹ , XING Weijie ¹ , ZHANG Mengxing ¹ , ZHONG Jie ¹ , FU Liang ¹

1. School of Nursing, Fudan University; University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Shanghai Evidence-based Nursing Center, Shanghai, 200032, P.R.China;
2. National Center for Medical Service Administration, National Health Commission, Beijing, 100044, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

WANG Qiang, Email: jason2019@sina.cn; HU Yan, Email: huyan@fudan.edu.cn

Keywords：

Clinical practice guideline; Evidence-based nursing; Quality criteria; Reliability and validity

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.201807027

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objectives To evaluate the reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines.Methods Five appraisers were included to assess two clinical nursing practice guidelines using the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines and AGREE Ⅱ. ICC and coefficient of consistency were adopted to assess the reliability and validity of the appraisal tools.Results ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines were 0.979 and 0.890. ICC for two guidelines of AIDS and infusion by AGREE Ⅱ were 0.957 and 0.887. The coefficient of consistency for guidelines of AIDS and infusion by the two appraisal tools were 0.880 and 0.886, both were highly consistent.Conclusions The quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines has good reliability and validity and can be used as appraisal tool for quality evaluation of clinical nursing practice guidelines. It is strongly recommended that the users should understand the appraisal tool or should be trained to decrease the bias.

Citation： ZHOU Yingfeng, WANG Qiang, HU Yan, XING Weijie, ZHANG Mengxing, ZHONG Jie, FU Liang. Evaluation of reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2019, 19(1): 84-88. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.201807027 Copy

1.	王小欽, 王吉耀. 循證臨床實踐指南的制定與實施. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2016.1-50.
2.	Available at: https://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library.
3.	IOM. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC. The national Academies Press, 2011.
4.	Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet, 1993, 342(8883): 1317-1322.
5.	Lannone P, Montano N, Minardi M, et al. Wrong guidelines: why and how often they occur. Evid Based Med, 2017, 22(1): 1-3.
6.	李楠, 姚亮, 吳瓊芳, 等. 2012~2013 年中國大陸期刊發表臨床實踐指南質量評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2013, 13(6): 621-623.
7.	王琪. 中國臨床實踐指南質量評價研究. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2017.
8.	上海市公衛衛生臨床中心, 復旦大學 JBI 循證護理合作中心. 艾滋病臨床護理實踐指南. 2014.
9.	Infusion nurses society. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs, 2016, 39(1S): S1-S113.
10.	王吉耀, 王強, 王小欽, 等. 中國臨床實踐指南評價體系的制定與初步驗證. 中華醫學雜志, 2018, 98(20): 1544-1548.
11.	周英鳳, 王強, 胡雁, 等. 中國護理領域臨床實踐指南質量評價標準的構建. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2018, 18(9): 1-5.
12.	Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. The global rating scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 65(5): 526-534.
13.	方積乾, 陸盈. 現代醫學統計學. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2002: 80-87.
14.	馬斌榮. 醫學科研中的統計方法. 北京: 北京科學出版社, 2005: 3.
15.	陳耀龍, 楊克虎, 田金徽, 等. 循證實踐指南的制定: 國際經驗與中國實踐. 蘭州大學學報 (醫學版), 2016, 42(1): 29-35.
16.	Siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, et al. Appraisal tools for clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. PLoS one, 2013, 8(12): e 82915.
17.	張悅, 張士靖, 周志超, 等. 國際臨床指南評價工具的發展與啟示. 中華醫學圖書情報雜志, 2015, 24(1): 11-16.
18.	胡雁, 郝玉芳. 循證護理學. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2018: 216.

1. 王小欽, 王吉耀. 循證臨床實踐指南的制定與實施. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2016.1-50.
2. Available at: https://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library.
3. IOM. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC. The national Academies Press, 2011.
4. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet, 1993, 342(8883): 1317-1322.
5. Lannone P, Montano N, Minardi M, et al. Wrong guidelines: why and how often they occur. Evid Based Med, 2017, 22(1): 1-3.
6. 李楠, 姚亮, 吳瓊芳, 等. 2012~2013 年中國大陸期刊發表臨床實踐指南質量評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2013, 13(6): 621-623.
7. 王琪. 中國臨床實踐指南質量評價研究. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2017.
8. 上海市公衛衛生臨床中心, 復旦大學 JBI 循證護理合作中心. 艾滋病臨床護理實踐指南. 2014.
9. Infusion nurses society. Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs, 2016, 39(1S): S1-S113.
10. 王吉耀, 王強, 王小欽, 等. 中國臨床實踐指南評價體系的制定與初步驗證. 中華醫學雜志, 2018, 98(20): 1544-1548.
11. 周英鳳, 王強, 胡雁, 等. 中國護理領域臨床實踐指南質量評價標準的構建. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2018, 18(9): 1-5.
12. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. The global rating scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 2012, 65(5): 526-534.
13. 方積乾, 陸盈. 現代醫學統計學. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2002: 80-87.
14. 馬斌榮. 醫學科研中的統計方法. 北京: 北京科學出版社, 2005: 3.
15. 陳耀龍, 楊克虎, 田金徽, 等. 循證實踐指南的制定: 國際經驗與中國實踐. 蘭州大學學報 (醫學版), 2016, 42(1): 29-35.
16. Siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, et al. Appraisal tools for clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. PLoS one, 2013, 8(12): e 82915.
17. 張悅, 張士靖, 周志超, 等. 國際臨床指南評價工具的發展與啟示. 中華醫學圖書情報雜志, 2015, 24(1): 11-16.
18. 胡雁, 郝玉芳. 循證護理學. 北京: 人民衛生出版社, 2018: 216.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Evaluation of reliability and validity on quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content