Introduction and Explanation of the Updated Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD 2015)_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 ZHUYi-dan ¹ , LIHui-juan ² ,  WUYang-feng ^1,2,3

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing 100191, China;
3. The George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center (PUHSC), Beijing 100191, China;

Corresponding?author：

WUYang-feng, Email: wuyf@bjmu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Diagnostic Test; The Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies; Update; Potential bias; Reporting transparency

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20160112

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

The Standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) 2015 is a revision of the STARD 2003 on the checklist and flow chart, on the basis of the new evidences of potential bias and applicability, to better guide the application of diagnostic test in clinical practices. Currently, the interpretation and application in China is still based on STARD 2003. This review will describe the application status of the original version and introduce the updated standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.

Citation： ZHUYi-dan, LIHui-juan, WUYang-feng. Introduction and Explanation of the Updated Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD 2015). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(6): 730-735. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160112 Copy

1.	?Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 826-832.
2.	Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ, 2003, 326(7379): 41-44.
3.	Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(10): 1093-1104.
4.	Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem, 2003, 49(1): 7-18.
5.	Lijmer JG. Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias. JAMA, 1999, 282(11): 1061-1066.
6.	Ochodo EA, de Haan MC, Reitsma JB, et al. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of “spin”. Radiology, 2013, 267(2): 581-588.
7.	Korevaar DA, Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PMM, et al. Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Clin Chem, 2014, 60(4): 651-659.
8.	Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 2001, 357(9263): 1191-1194.
9.	STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.Avaliable at: http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard/.
10.	Kressel HY. STARD 2015 Update. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 617.
11.	刁驤, 秦莉, 姚巡(譯). 邁向完整、準確的診斷準確性研究報告: STARD計劃. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2006, 6(7): 523-528.
12.	王波, 詹思延. 如何撰寫高質量的流行病學研究論文第三講診斷試驗準確性研究的報告規范——STARD介紹. 中華流行病學雜志, 2006, 27(10): 909-912.
13.	Simel DL, Rennie D, Bossuyt PMM. The STARD statement for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: application to the history and physical examination. J Gen Intern Med, 2008, 23(6): 768-774.
14.	Noel-Storr AH, McCleery JM, Richard E, et al. Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: The STARDdem Initiative. Neurology, 2014, 83(4): 364-373.
15.	Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, et al. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med, 2014, 19(2): 47-54.
16.	Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology, 2015, 274(3): 781-789.
17.	Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PM. Reporting the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative 10 years on. Clin Chem, 2013, 59(6): 917-919.
18.	Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet (London, England), 2014, 383(9913): 267-276.

1. ?Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 826-832.
2. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ, 2003, 326(7379): 41-44.
3. Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol, 2013, 66(10): 1093-1104.
4. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem, 2003, 49(1): 7-18.
5. Lijmer JG. Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias. JAMA, 1999, 282(11): 1061-1066.
6. Ochodo EA, de Haan MC, Reitsma JB, et al. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of “spin”. Radiology, 2013, 267(2): 581-588.
7. Korevaar DA, Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PMM, et al. Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Clin Chem, 2014, 60(4): 651-659.
8. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 2001, 357(9263): 1191-1194.
9. STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.Avaliable at: http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard/.
10. Kressel HY. STARD 2015 Update. Radiology, 2015, 277(3): 617.
11. 刁驤, 秦莉, 姚巡(譯). 邁向完整、準確的診斷準確性研究報告: STARD計劃. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2006, 6(7): 523-528.
12. 王波, 詹思延. 如何撰寫高質量的流行病學研究論文第三講診斷試驗準確性研究的報告規范——STARD介紹. 中華流行病學雜志, 2006, 27(10): 909-912.
13. Simel DL, Rennie D, Bossuyt PMM. The STARD statement for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: application to the history and physical examination. J Gen Intern Med, 2008, 23(6): 768-774.
14. Noel-Storr AH, McCleery JM, Richard E, et al. Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementia: The STARDdem Initiative. Neurology, 2014, 83(4): 364-373.
15. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, et al. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med, 2014, 19(2): 47-54.
16. Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology, 2015, 274(3): 781-789.
17. Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PM. Reporting the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative 10 years on. Clin Chem, 2013, 59(6): 917-919.
18. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet (London, England), 2014, 383(9913): 267-276.

Previous Article
Quality Assessment for Primary Health Care in Practice: A Descriptive Systematic Review
Next Article
The Application of RevMan, Stata and R Software for Meta-analysis of Survival Data

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Introduction and Explanation of the Updated Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD 2015)

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content