• 1. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University;? 2. Health Research Methodology PhD Program and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics;?3. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services;?4. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Medical Research Council of South Africa;?5. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, University of Oslo;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

政策制定者及其決策支持者常發現他們會面臨一些促使他們想找到定義一個問題的最佳方法的情況,包括如在議會上被問及一個棘手或有挑戰性的問題或成為頭條新聞的問題。政策制定者想找準問題的動機多種多樣. 從想確定是否該對他人認為重要的問題給予重視, 到如何說服他人認同某一問題的重要性。圍繞如何定義一個問題的爭論和努力是政策制定過程中至關重要的部分。這些爭論和努力的結果將影響決策者決定是否采取行動來解決問題及對其決定如何采取措施也有部分影響。這些并行事件與政策和項目方案(如發表一份展示特定方案效果的報告),或政治事件(如對某一問題感興趣的人被任命為衛生部長)有關。我們在本文中提出以下問題來指導那些需要定義問題并描述問題特點的人:① 問題是什么?② 問題是如何引起關注的?該過程是否會影響解決這一問題的前景?③ 應使用或收集什么指標來確定問題的重要程度和評估問題解決的進展程度?④ 應采用何種對照來確定問題的重要程度并評估問題解決的進展程度?⑤ 應如何擬訂(或描述)問題來動員不同群體?

Citation: John N Lavis,Michael G Wilson,Andrew D Oxman,Simon Lewin,Atle Fretheim. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4:? Using research rvidence to clarify a problem*. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010, 10(3): 262-268. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20100396 Copy

Copyright ? the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

  • Previous Article

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 3: Setting priorities for supporting evidence-informed policymaking*
  • Next Article

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 5: Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem*