Comparison of open airway inhalation and conventional inhalation in asthma patients_Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Authors：

SUN Lin ,  WU Xiaoling , MA Wenjuan , LU Haiyan , ZHU Yingying

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

WU Xiaoling, Email: xiaoling-wu1964@163.com

Keywords：

Open airway inhalation; Inhaled preparations; Asthma control

DOI：

10.7507/1671-6205.202011057

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To study and compare the effects of inhaled preparations with open airway and conventional inhaled preparation on asthma patients.Methods The patients diagnosed with asthma and treated with the same inhaled preparation only who visited the outpatient department of West China Hospital of Sichuan University, were selected as the study subjects from April to September, 2019. The subjects were divided into the test group and the control group according to random ratio 1∶1. The conventional inhaled preparations were used in the control group. The inhaled preparations with open airway were used in the test group. Asthma control, life quality and treatment satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups after 3 months.Results A total of 150 subjects were included and one case dropped-off, then 149 effective subjects were obtained in which 75 cases in the test group and 74 cases in the control group. After 3 months’ treatment of inhaled preparations, the proportion of effective asthma control patients in the test group was higher than that in the control group, and the number of patients satisfied with the treatment of inhaled preparations was higher than that in the control group, with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). The life quality of patients in both groups was improved compared with baseline, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the increase of scores in the test group was more than that in the control group, and the difference was also statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Inhaed preparations with open airway is superior to conventional inhaled preparation on asthma patients in asthma control, life quality and treatment satisfaction rate.

Citation： SUN Lin, WU Xiaoling, MA Wenjuan, LU Haiyan, ZHU Yingying. Comparison of open airway inhalation and conventional inhalation in asthma patients. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2021, 20(5): 335-338. doi: 10.7507/1671-6205.202011057 Copy

1.	中華醫學會呼吸病學分會哮喘學組. 支氣管哮喘防治指南(2016 年版). 中華結核和呼吸雜志, 2016, 39(9): 675-687.
2.	王剛, 張欣, 王蕾, 等. 輕度支氣管哮喘治療策略的商榷. 中華結核和呼吸雜志, 2018, 41(7): 572-576.
3.	中華醫學會呼吸病學分會哮喘學組. 支氣管哮喘控制的中國專家共識. 中華內科雜志, 2013, 52(5): 440-443.
4.	支氣管哮喘患者自我管理中國專家共識. 支氣管哮喘患者自我管理中國專家共識. 中華結核和呼吸雜志, 2018, 41(3): 171-178.
5.	龍虹羽, 林江濤. 哮喘患者的自我管理與哮喘行動計劃. 中華醫學雜志, 2019, 99(16): 1271-1273.
6.	Escobedo MB, Aziz K, Kapadia VS, et al. 2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Neonatal Resuscitation: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 2019, 140(24): e922-e930.
7.	Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2004, 113(1): 59-65.
8.	王茜, 李曉乾, 葉紅, 等. 延續護理模式在支氣管哮喘患者中應用的效果. 牡丹江醫學院學報, 2015, 36(2): 115-117.
9.	Yang MY, Chan JG, Chan HK. Pulmonary drug delivery by powder aerosols. J Controlled Release, 2014, 193: 228-240.
10.	薛文東. 影響吸入粉霧劑療效發揮的因素分析. 中國呼吸與危重監護雜志, 2013, 12(5): 537-540.
11.	田沛, 楊志強, 王杏林, 等. 影響干粉吸入劑肺部給藥過程的因素. 中國新藥雜志, 2015, 24(21): 2459-2466.

1. 中華醫學會呼吸病學分會哮喘學組. 支氣管哮喘防治指南(2016 年版). 中華結核和呼吸雜志, 2016, 39(9): 675-687.
2. 王剛, 張欣, 王蕾, 等. 輕度支氣管哮喘治療策略的商榷. 中華結核和呼吸雜志, 2018, 41(7): 572-576.
3. 中華醫學會呼吸病學分會哮喘學組. 支氣管哮喘控制的中國專家共識. 中華內科雜志, 2013, 52(5): 440-443.
4. 支氣管哮喘患者自我管理中國專家共識. 支氣管哮喘患者自我管理中國專家共識. 中華結核和呼吸雜志, 2018, 41(3): 171-178.
5. 龍虹羽, 林江濤. 哮喘患者的自我管理與哮喘行動計劃. 中華醫學雜志, 2019, 99(16): 1271-1273.
6. Escobedo MB, Aziz K, Kapadia VS, et al. 2019 American Heart Association Focused Update on Neonatal Resuscitation: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 2019, 140(24): e922-e930.
7. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2004, 113(1): 59-65.
8. 王茜, 李曉乾, 葉紅, 等. 延續護理模式在支氣管哮喘患者中應用的效果. 牡丹江醫學院學報, 2015, 36(2): 115-117.
9. Yang MY, Chan JG, Chan HK. Pulmonary drug delivery by powder aerosols. J Controlled Release, 2014, 193: 228-240.
10. 薛文東. 影響吸入粉霧劑療效發揮的因素分析. 中國呼吸與危重監護雜志, 2013, 12(5): 537-540.
11. 田沛, 楊志強, 王杏林, 等. 影響干粉吸入劑肺部給藥過程的因素. 中國新藥雜志, 2015, 24(21): 2459-2466.

Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Comparison of open airway inhalation and conventional inhalation in asthma patients

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content