| 1. |
Chiarello MM, Fransvea P, Cariati M, et al. Anastomotic leakage in colorectal cancer surgery. Surg Oncol, 2022, 40: 101708. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101708.
|
| 2. |
McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, et al. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg, 2015, 102(5): 462-479.
|
| 3. |
劉軍廣, 陳賀凱, 汪欣, 等. 腹腔鏡低位直腸癌經括約肌間切除術后吻合口漏的影響因素分析及預測模型構建. 中華外科雜志, 2021, 59(5): 332-337.
|
| 4. |
馮永飛, 金相任, 劉洋, 等. 結直腸癌術后吻合口漏預測因素研究進展. 國際外科學雜志, 2021, 48(2): 137-140.
|
| 5. |
Zarnescu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R. Updates of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(12): 2382. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122382.
|
| 6. |
Koliarakis I, Athanasakis E, Sgantzos M, et al. Intestinal microbiota in colorectal cancer surgery. Cancers (Basel), 2020, 12(10): 3011. doi: 10.3390/cancers12103011.
|
| 7. |
Gaines S, Shao C, Hyman N, et al. Gut microbiome influences on anastomotic leak and recurrence rates following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(2): e131-e141. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10760.
|
| 8. |
Bibbò S, Ianiro G, Giorgio V, et al. The role of diet on gut microbiota composition. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2016, 20(22): 4742-4749.
|
| 9. |
王麗娜, 蘇秀蘭. 腸道微生物與結直腸癌. 生命的化學, 2021, 41(1): 25-32.
|
| 10. |
Zhang S, Kong C, Yang Y, et al. Human oral microbiome dysbiosis as a novel non-invasive biomarker in detection of colorectal cancer. Theranostics, 2020, 10(25): 11595-11606.
|
| 11. |
張明海, 楊依迪, 周誠斌, 等. 結直腸癌與腸道微生物群研究進展. 中國微生態學雜志, 2020, 32(3): 358-363.
|
| 12. |
Ohigashi S, Sudo K, Kobayashi D, et al. Significant changes in the intestinal environment after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg, 2013, 17(9): 1657-1664.
|
| 13. |
Guyton K, Alverdy JC. The gut microbiota and gastrointestinal surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 14(1): 43-54.
|
| 14. |
Shogan BD, Smith DP, Christley S, et al. Intestinal anastomotic injury alters spatially defined microbiome composition and function. Microbiome, 2014, 2: 35. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-35.
|
| 15. |
Lam A, Fleischer B, Alverdy J. The biology of anastomotic healing-the unknown overwhelms the known. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(9): 2160-2166.
|
| 16. |
Karrasch T, Jobin C. Wound healing responses at the gastrointestinal epithelium: a close look at novel regulatory factors and investigative approaches. Z Gastroenterol, 2009, 47(12): 1221-1229.
|
| 17. |
Lee DS, Ryu JA, Chung CR, et al. Risk factors for acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2015, 30(4): 497-504.
|
| 18. |
Komen N, Slieker J, Willemsen P, et al. Polymerase chain reaction for Enterococcus faecalis in drain fluid: the first screening test for symptomatic colorectal anastomotic leakage. The appeal-study: analysis of parameters predictive for evident anastomotic leakage. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(1): 15-21.
|
| 19. |
Neumann PA, Twardy V, Becker F, et al. Assessment of MMP-2/-9 expression by fluorescence endoscopy for evaluation of anastomotic healing in a murine model of anastomotic leakage. PLoS One, 2018, 13(3): e0194249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194249.
|
| 20. |
El Bairi K, Jabi R, Trapani D, et al. Can the microbiota predict response to systemic cancer therapy, surgical outcomes, and survival? The answer is in the gut. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol, 2020, 13(4): 403-421.
|
| 21. |
Olivas AD, Shogan BD, Valuckaite V, et al. Intestinal tissues induce an SNP mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that enhances its virulence: possible role in anastomotic leak. PLoS One, 2012, 7(8): e44326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044326.
|
| 22. |
Gershuni VM, Friedman ES. The microbiome-host interaction as a potential driver of anastomotic leak. Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2019, 21(1): 4. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0668-7.
|
| 23. |
Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM, et al. Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med, 2015, 7(286): 286ra68. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3010658.
|
| 24. |
Hyoju SK, Klabbers RE, Aaron M, et al. Oral polyphosphate suppresses bacterial collagenase production and prevents anastomotic leak due to Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(6): 1112-1118.
|
| 25. |
Anderson DI, Keskey R, Ackerman MT, et al. Enterococcus faecalis is associated with anastomotic leak in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2021, 22(10): 1047-1051.
|
| 26. |
Pasternak B, Rehn M, Andersen L, et al. Doxycycline-coated sutures improve mechanical strength of intestinal anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2008, 23(3): 271-276.
|
| 27. |
Lederer AK, Chikhladze S, Kohnert E, et al. Current insights: the impact of gut microbiota on postoperative complications in visceral surgery—a narrative review. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(11): 2099. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112099.
|
| 28. |
Watanabe M, Murakami M, Nakao K, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the influence of mechanical bowel preparation on faecal microflora in patients undergoing colonic cancer resection. Br J Surg, 2010, 97(12): 1791-1797.
|
| 29. |
Gaines S, Williamson A, Pena R, et al. 234–preoperative bowel preparation decreases colonization with collagenase producing bacteria in non-obese patients. Gastroenterology, 2019, 156(6): S1393-S1394. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(19)40520-9.
|
| 30. |
Drago L, Valentina C, Fabio P. Gut microbiota, dysbiosis and colon lavage. Dig Liver Dis, 2019, 51(9): 1209-1213.
|
| 31. |
Williamson AJ, Alverdy JC. Influence of the microbiome on anastomotic leak. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2021, 34(6): 439-446.
|
| 32. |
De La Cochetière MF, Durand T, Lepage P, et al. Resilience of the dominant human fecal microbiota upon short-course antibiotic challenge. J Clin Microbiol, 2005, 43(11): 5588-5592.
|
| 33. |
Pérez-Cobas AE, Gosalbes MJ, Friedrichs A, et al. Gut microbiota disturbance during antibiotic therapy: a multi-omic approach. Gut, 2013, 62(11): 1591-1601.
|
| 34. |
Zimmermann P, Curtis N. The effect of antibiotics on the composition of the intestinal microbiota—a systematic review. J Infect, 2019, 79(6): 471-489.
|
| 35. |
Golder AM, Steele CW, Conn D, et al. Effect of preoperative oral antibiotics in combination with mechanical bowel preparation on inflammatory response and short-term outcomes following left-sided colonic and rectal resections. BJS Open, 2019, 3(6): 830-839.
|
| 36. |
Kiran RP, Murray AC, Chiuzan C, et al. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(3): 416-425.
|
| 37. |
Klinger AL, Green H, Monlezun DJ, et al. The role of bowel preparation in colorectal surgery: results of the 2012–2015 ACS-NSQIP data. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(4): 671-677.
|
| 38. |
Ambe PC, Zarras K, Stodolski M, et al. Routine preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with additive oral antibiotics is associated with a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing elective oncologic resection for colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol, 2019, 17(1): 20. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1563-2.
|
| 39. |
van Praagh JB, de Goffau MC, Bakker IS, et al. Mucus microbiome of anastomotic tissue during surgery has predictive value for colorectal anastomotic leakage. Ann Surg. 2019, 269(5): 911-916.
|
| 40. |
Hartman AL, Lough DM, Barupal DK, et al. Human gut microbiome adopts an alternative state following small bowel transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(40): 17187-17192.
|
| 41. |
McBrayer DN, Gantman BK, Tal-Gan Y. N-methylation of amino acids in gelatinase biosynthesis-activating pheromone identifies key site for stability enhancement with retention of the Enterococcus faecalis fsr quorum sensing circuit response. ACS Infect Dis, 2019, 5(6): 1035-1041.
|
| 42. |
Wiegerinck M, Hyoju SK, Mao J, et al. Novel de novo synthesized phosphate carrier compound ABA-PEG20k-Pi20 suppresses collagenase production in Enterococcus faecalis and prevents colonic anastomotic leak in an experimental model. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(10): 1368-1376.
|
| 43. |
Nichols D, Pimentel MB, Borges FTP, et al. Sustained release of phosphates from hydrogel nanoparticles suppresses bacterial collagenase and biofilm formation in vitro. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019, 7: 153. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00153.
|
| 44. |
Hajjar R, Richard CS, Santos MM. The role of butyrate in surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2021, 320(4): G601-G608. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00316.2020.
|
| 45. |
Bosmans JW, Jongen AC, Boonen BT, et al. Comparison of three different application routes of butyrate to improve colonic anastomotic strength in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2017, 32(3): 305-313.
|
| 46. |
Hajjar R, Oliero M, Cuisiniere T, et al. Improvement of colonic healing and surgical recovery with perioperative supplementation of inulin and galacto-oligosaccharides. Clin Nutr, 2021, 40(6): 3842-3851.
|