Prognostic Nomogram for gastric adenocarcinoma: a SEER database-based study_CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Authors：

LIU Pengdi , ZHANG Yafei , LU Hongwei , JI Hong , HONG Ruofeng ,  LI Yiming

Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710004, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

LI Yiming, Email: liyiming2003@sina.com

Keywords：

gastric adenocarcinoma; database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; survival analysis; Nomogram

DOI：

10.7507/1007-9424.201804048

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective Establishing Nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma by utilizing the database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Methods Obtained the data of 3 272 gastric adenocarcinoma patients who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 from the SEER database. These patients were randomly divided into training (n=2 182) and validation (n=1 090) cohorts. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to evaluate the prognostic effects of multiple clinicopathologic factors on OS. Significant prognostic factors were combined to build Nomogram. The predictive performance of Nomogram was evaluated via internal (training cohort data) and external validation (validation cohort data) by calculating index of concordance (C-index) and plotting calibration curves. Results In the training cohort, the results of Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that, age at diagnosis, race, grade, 6^th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, histologic type, and surgery were significantly associated with the survival prognosis (P<0.05). These factors were used to establish Nomogram. The Nomograms showed good accuracy in predicting OS rate, with C-index of 0.751 ［95%CI was (0.738, 0.764)］ in internal validation and C-index of 0.753 ［95% CI was (0.734, 0.772)］ in external validation. All calibration curves showed excellent consistency between prediction by Nomogram and actual observation. Conclusion Novel Nomogram for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was established to predict OS in our study has good prognostic significance, it can provide clinicians with more accurate and practical predictive tools which can quickly and accurately assess the patients’ survival prognosis individually, and can better guiding clinicians in the follow-up treatment of patients.

Citation： LIU Pengdi, ZHANG Yafei, LU Hongwei, JI Hong, HONG Ruofeng, LI Yiming. Prognostic Nomogram for gastric adenocarcinoma: a SEER database-based study. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2018, 25(10): 1183-1189. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.201804048 Copy

1.	Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, et al. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends-an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2016, 25(1): 16-27.
2.	Ajani JA, Lee J, Sano T, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017, 3: 17036.
3.	李小寶, 梅樂園, 車向明. 影響胃癌預后因素的研究進展. 中國普通外科雜志, 2013, 22(4): 494-497.
4.	梁寒. 影響胃癌預后因素研究進展. 中國實用外科雜志, 2011, 31(8): 726-729.
5.	Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, et al. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(4): e173-e180.
6.	Liang W, Zhang L, Jiang G, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(8): 861-869.
7.	Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(9): 1188-1195.
8.	Wang ZX, Qiu MZ, Jiang YM, et al. Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer. J Cancer, 2017, 8(6): 950-958.
9.	Cronin KA, Ries LA, Edwards BK. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the national cancer institute. Cancer, 2014, 120(Suppl 23): 3755-3757.
10.	Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med, 1996, 15(4): 361-387.
11.	Huitzil-Melendez FD, Capanu M, O’Reilly EM, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis? J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(17): 2889-2895.
12.	Sternberg CN. Are nomograms better than currently available stage groupings for bladder cancer? J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(24): 3819-3820.
13.	Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zeng H, et al. Nomograms for predicting the overall and cancer-specific survival of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a SEER-based study. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(54): 92978-92988.
14.	Liu J, Su M, Hong S, et al. Nomogram predicts survival benefit from preoperative radiotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer: a SEER-based study. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(30): 49861-49868.
15.	Zhang ZY, Luo QF, Yin XW, et al. Nomograms to predict survival after colorectal cancer resection without preoperative therapy. BMC Cancer, 2016, 16(1): 658.
16.	Mohanty S, Bilimoria KY. Comparing national cancer registries: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. J Surg Oncol, 2014, 109(7): 629-630.
17.	楊維良, 張新晨, 張東偉, 等. 35歲以下胃癌患者380例臨床分析. 中華胃腸外科雜志, 2004, 7(5): 357-359.
18.	Llanos O, Butte JM, Crovari F, et al. Survival of young patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg, 2006, 30(1): 17-20.
19.	Kim DY, Joo JK, Ryu SY, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: a comparison with young patients. World J Gastroenterol, 2005, 11(1): 22-26.
20.	Wang A, Squires MH 3^rd, Melis M, et al. Stage-specific prognostic effect of race in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma: an 8-institution study of the US gastric cancer collaborative. J Am Coll Surg, 2016, 222(4): 633-643.
21.	Sun F, Sun H, Mo X, et al. Increased survival rates in gastric cancer, with a narrowing gender gap and widening socioeconomic status gap: a period analysis from 1984 to 2013. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(4): 837-846.
22.	Lauren P. The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma, an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand, 1965, 64: 31-49.
23.	Chen YC, Fang WL, Wang RF, et al. Clinicopathological variation of lauren classification in gastric cancer. Pathol Oncol Res, 2016, 22(1): 197-202.
24.	Papachristou DN, Fortner JG. Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. The choice of gastrectomy. Ann Surg, 1980, 192(1): 58-64.
25.	Sugoor P, Shah S, Dusane R, et al. Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal third gastric cancer: total gastrectomy is not always necessary. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016, 401(5): 687-697.
26.	Li Z, Bai B, Xie F, et al. Distal versus total gastrectomy for middle and lower-third gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg, 2018, 53: 163-170.
27.	Yamamoto M, Shimokawa M, Kawano H, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic surgery compared to open standard surgery for gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: propensity score-matching analysis. Surg Endosc, 2018, [Epub ahead of print].
28.	Lee JH, Park B, Joo J, et al. Body mass index and mortality in patients with gastric cancer: a large cohort study. Gastric Cancer, 2018, [Epub ahead of print].

1. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, et al. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends-an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2016, 25(1): 16-27.
2. Ajani JA, Lee J, Sano T, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017, 3: 17036.
3. 李小寶, 梅樂園, 車向明. 影響胃癌預后因素的研究進展. 中國普通外科雜志, 2013, 22(4): 494-497.
4. 梁寒. 影響胃癌預后因素研究進展. 中國實用外科雜志, 2011, 31(8): 726-729.
5. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, et al. Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(4): e173-e180.
6. Liang W, Zhang L, Jiang G, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(8): 861-869.
7. Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(9): 1188-1195.
8. Wang ZX, Qiu MZ, Jiang YM, et al. Comparison of prognostic nomograms based on different nodal staging systems in patients with resected gastric cancer. J Cancer, 2017, 8(6): 950-958.
9. Cronin KA, Ries LA, Edwards BK. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the national cancer institute. Cancer, 2014, 120(Suppl 23): 3755-3757.
10. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med, 1996, 15(4): 361-387.
11. Huitzil-Melendez FD, Capanu M, O’Reilly EM, et al. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis? J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(17): 2889-2895.
12. Sternberg CN. Are nomograms better than currently available stage groupings for bladder cancer? J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(24): 3819-3820.
13. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zeng H, et al. Nomograms for predicting the overall and cancer-specific survival of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a SEER-based study. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(54): 92978-92988.
14. Liu J, Su M, Hong S, et al. Nomogram predicts survival benefit from preoperative radiotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer: a SEER-based study. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(30): 49861-49868.
15. Zhang ZY, Luo QF, Yin XW, et al. Nomograms to predict survival after colorectal cancer resection without preoperative therapy. BMC Cancer, 2016, 16(1): 658.
16. Mohanty S, Bilimoria KY. Comparing national cancer registries: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. J Surg Oncol, 2014, 109(7): 629-630.
17. 楊維良, 張新晨, 張東偉, 等. 35歲以下胃癌患者380例臨床分析. 中華胃腸外科雜志, 2004, 7(5): 357-359.
18. Llanos O, Butte JM, Crovari F, et al. Survival of young patients after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg, 2006, 30(1): 17-20.
19. Kim DY, Joo JK, Ryu SY, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: a comparison with young patients. World J Gastroenterol, 2005, 11(1): 22-26.
20. Wang A, Squires MH 3^rd, Melis M, et al. Stage-specific prognostic effect of race in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma: an 8-institution study of the US gastric cancer collaborative. J Am Coll Surg, 2016, 222(4): 633-643.
21. Sun F, Sun H, Mo X, et al. Increased survival rates in gastric cancer, with a narrowing gender gap and widening socioeconomic status gap: a period analysis from 1984 to 2013. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(4): 837-846.
22. Lauren P. The two histologic main types of gastric carcinoma: diffuse and so-called intestinal type carcinoma, an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand, 1965, 64: 31-49.
23. Chen YC, Fang WL, Wang RF, et al. Clinicopathological variation of lauren classification in gastric cancer. Pathol Oncol Res, 2016, 22(1): 197-202.
24. Papachristou DN, Fortner JG. Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia. The choice of gastrectomy. Ann Surg, 1980, 192(1): 58-64.
25. Sugoor P, Shah S, Dusane R, et al. Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal third gastric cancer: total gastrectomy is not always necessary. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016, 401(5): 687-697.
26. Li Z, Bai B, Xie F, et al. Distal versus total gastrectomy for middle and lower-third gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg, 2018, 53: 163-170.
27. Yamamoto M, Shimokawa M, Kawano H, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic surgery compared to open standard surgery for gastric carcinoma in elderly patients: propensity score-matching analysis. Surg Endosc, 2018, [Epub ahead of print].
28. Lee JH, Park B, Joo J, et al. Body mass index and mortality in patients with gastric cancer: a large cohort study. Gastric Cancer, 2018, [Epub ahead of print].

CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Prognostic Nomogram for gastric adenocarcinoma: a SEER database-based study

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content