Da-Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis_Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Authors：

ZENG Weiqiang ¹ ,  GOU Yunjiu ² , BAI Xiangdou ¹

1. The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China;
2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

GOU Yunjiu, Email: gouyunjiu@163.com

Keywords：

Da-Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery; video-assisted thoracic surgery; lung cancer; systematic review/meta-analysis

DOI：

10.7507/1007-4848.202203008

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To compare the surgical efficacy of Da-Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Online databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM from inception to 18 February, 2022 were searched by two researchers independently. The references of related studies were also searched to re-enroll the potential studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Results A total of 43 studies including 33 089 patients were enrolled in the final study. The NOS scores of the included studies were ≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that the operation time was longer [MD=8.50, 95%CI (1.59, 15.41), P=0.020], the blood loss was less [MD=?46.58, 95%CI (?62.86, ?30.29), P＜0.001], the dissected lymph nodes stations were more [MD=0.67, 95%CI (0.40, 0.93), P＜0.001], the dissected lymph nodes were more [MD=2.39, 95%CI (1.43, 3.36), P＜0.001], the conversion rate was lower [OR=0.52, 95%CI (0.46, 0.59), P＜0.001], the time of chest tube drainage was shorter [MD=?0.35, 95%CI (?0.58, ?0.11), P=0.004], the length of hospital stay was shorter [MD=?0.32, 95%CI (?0.45, ?0.19), P＜0.001], and the recurrence rate was lower [OR=0.51, 95%CI (0.36, 0.72), P＜0.001] in the RATS group than those in the VATS group. The rate of overall postoperative complications [OR=0.95, 95%CI (0.89, 1.01), P=0.110] and postoperative mortality rate [OR=0.85, 95%CI (0.62, 1.16), P=0.300] were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Compared with VATS, although RATS prolongs the operation time, it does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality rates. Moreover, RATS can dissect more lymph nodes, effectively control intraoperative bleeding, shorten the duration of chest drainage tube indwelling and shorten the postoperative hospital stay to a certain extent.

Citation： ZENG Weiqiang, GOU Yunjiu, BAI Xiangdou. Da-Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2023, 30(3): 447-457. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.202203008 Copy

1.	Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
2.	趙云鵬, 叢波, 趙小剛, 等. 全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術與開胸肺葉切除術淋巴結清掃及生存的Meta分析. 中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2014, 30(8): 467-472.
3.	Lee BE, Shapiro M, Rutledge JR, et al. Nodal upstaging in robotic and video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for clinical N0 lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015, 100(1): 229-233.
4.	Bao F, Zhang C, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(7): 1798-1803.
5.	Oh DS, Reddy RM, Gorrepati ML, et al. Robotic-assisted, video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: Propensity-matched analysis of recent premier data. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 104(5): 1733-1740.
6.	劉星池, 許世廣, 劉博, 等. Ⅰ期非小細胞肺癌達芬奇機器人手術的療效分析. 中國肺癌雜志, 2018, 21(11): 849-856.
7.	馬繼龍, 金大成, 韓松辰, 等. 早期肺癌患者行達芬奇機器人與胸腔鏡肺癌根治術的病例對照研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2019, 26(1): 48-52.
8.	Merritt RE, Kneuertz PJ, D'Souza DM. Successful transition to robotic-assisted lobectomy with previous proficiency in thoracoscopic lobectomy. Innovations (Phila), 2019, 14(3): 263-271.
9.	Li JT, Liu PY, Huang J, et al. Perioperative outcomes of radical lobectomies using robotic-assisted thoracoscopic technique vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic technique:Retrospective study of 1, 075 consecutive p-stageⅠnon-small cell lung cancer cases. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(3): 882-891.
10.	Li C, Hu Y, Huang J, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted lobectomy with video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage ⅡB-ⅢA non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2019, 8(6): 820-828.
11.	同李平, 鄭曉慶, 段鴻濤, 等. 達芬奇機器人左肺上葉切除術治療肺癌的近期臨床效果分析. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2020, 27(2): 183-189.
12.	黃志剛, 吳彥崢, 劉亞鋒, 等. 達芬奇機器人輔助胸腔鏡肺葉切除術對肺癌患者心肺功能和生存質量的影響分析. 中國醫學前沿雜志(電子版), 2020, 12(5): 85-89.
13.	田禹, 黃佳, 陸佩吉, 等. 機器人輔助與胸腔鏡輔助右肺上葉切除術治療非小細胞肺癌的回顧性隊列研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2020, 27(10): 1134-1139.
14.	Veluswamy RR, Whittaker Brown SA, Mhango G, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery for resectable lung cancer in older patients. Chest, 2020, 157(5): 1313-1321.
15.	Zhou Q, Huang J, Pan F, et al. Operative outcomes and long-term survival of robotic-assisted segmentectomy for stage ⅠA lung cancer compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2020, 9(2): 306-315.
16.	Haruki T, Kubouchi Y, Takagi Y, et al. Comparison of medium-term survival outcomes between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in treating primary lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 68(9): 984-992.
17.	Zhang Y, Chen C, Hu J, et al. Early outcomes of robotic versus thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 160(5): 1363-1372.
18.	Qiu T, Zhao Y, Xuan Y, et al. Robotic sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-weighted comparison with thoracoscopic and open surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 160(3): 838-846.
19.	Kneuertz PJ, D'Souza DM, Richardson M, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approach. Clin Lung Cancer, 2020, 21(3): 214-224.
20.	Bodner J, Schmid T, Augustin F, et al. Minimally invasive approaches for lung lobectomy—From VATS to robotic and back. Eur Surg, 2011, 43(4): 224-228.
21.	Deen SA, Wilson JL, Wilshire CL, et al. Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: A comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(3): 1000-1007.
22.	Demir A, Ayalp K, Ozkan B, et al. Robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesions. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 20(3): 304-309.
23.	He Y, Coonar A, Gelvez-Zapata S, et al. Evaluation of a robot-assisted video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery programme. Exp Ther Med, 2014, 7(4): 873-876.
24.	Jang HJ, Lee HS, Park SY, et al. Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: A single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila), 2011, 6(5): 305-310.
25.	Lee BE, Korst RJ, Kletsman E, et al. Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: Are there outcomes advantages? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147(2): 724-729.
26.	Louie BE, Wilson JL, Kim S, et al. Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches for clinical stageⅠ and stageⅡnon-small cell lung cancer using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 102(3): 917-924.
27.	Mahieu J, Rinieri P, Bubenheim M, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung lobectomy: Can a robotic approach improve short-term outcomes and operative safety? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 64(4): 354-362.
28.	Mungo B, Hooker CM, Ho JS, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic resection for lung cancer: Early results of a new robotic program. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016, 26(4): 243-248.
29.	Swanson SJ, Miller DL, McKenna RJ, et al. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: Results from a multihospital database (Premier). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147(3): 929-937.
30.	Yang CF, Sun Z, Speicher PJ, et al. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stageⅠ non-small cell lung cancer in the national cancer data base. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 101(3): 1037-1042.
31.	Yang HX, Woo KM, Sima CS, et al. Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stageⅠnonsmall cell lung cancer: Comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(2): 431-437.
32.	郭洪撥, 喻本桐. 機器人與胸腔鏡肺葉切除術在治療早期非小細胞肺癌的安全性與療效對比. 實用醫學雜志, 2019, 35(4): 541-545.
33.	何天煜, 王鶯, 劉佳聰, 等. VATS與RATS精準解剖的亞肺葉聯合切除術的回顧性隊列研究. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2022, 3(1): 4-14.
34.	倪恒, 陸豪健, 王一青, 等. 機器人與胸腔鏡袖式肺葉切除術治療非小細胞肺癌的比較研究. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2022, 3(1): 15-21.
35.	柴新春, 許世廣, 劉博, 等. ⅠA期非小細胞肺癌行達芬奇機器人和電視胸腔鏡肺段切除術近期療效對比分析. 中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2021, 37(11): 644-648.
36.	張真發, 岳東升, 王勐, 等. 達芬奇機器人系統與胸腔鏡在肺癌根治術中的近期療效比較及經驗探討. 中國腫瘤臨床, 2021, 48(10): 511-515.
37.	薛家龍, 徐惟, 劉星池, 等. 達芬奇機器人與電視胸腔鏡手術對非小細胞肺癌患者術后免疫功能影響的對比研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2021, 28(5): 534-539.
38.	李青元, 陶紹霖, 康珀銘, 等. 機器人與胸腔鏡肺葉切除對非小細胞肺癌患者機體創傷及淋巴細胞亞群的影響. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2021, 28(3): 299-304.
39.	葉貫超, 劉亞飛, 張春敭, 等. 達芬奇機器人與胸腔鏡肺段切除術治療早期非小細胞肺癌的有效性對比. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2021, 2(1): 1-9.
40.	吳曉, 徐金明, 王鶯, 等. 機器人與胸腔鏡肺段切除術治療非小細胞肺癌的傾向性評分匹配研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2020, 27(10): 1150-1154.
41.	謝博恒, 隋天一, 秦毅, 等. 機器人輔助與電視輔助胸腔鏡肺段切除術治療早期非小細胞肺癌短期效果比較. 中國肺癌雜志, 2019, 22(12): 767-771.
42.	代鋒, 許世廣, 徐惟, 等. 達芬奇機器人與電視胸腔鏡輔助非小細胞肺癌根治術近期療效配對的病例對照研究. 中國肺癌雜志, 2018, 21(3): 206-211.
43.	楊倫, 喻本桐, 張智, 等. 達芬奇機器人與胸腔鏡根治手術治療非小細胞肺癌效果比較. 濰坊醫學院學報, 2018, 40(1): 73-75.
44.	成名, 許世廣, 徐惟, 等. 機器人輔助與胸腔鏡非小細胞肺癌手術近遠期生存比較. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2022, 29(9): 1133-1139.
45.	Rajaram R, Mohanty S, Bentrem DJ, et al. Nationwide assessment of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 103(4): 1092-1100.
46.	Augustin F, Bodner J, Maier H, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: Comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2013, 398(6): 895-901.
47.	賀生亮, 郭天康, 柏啟州, 等. 達芬奇機器人系統在高齡患者肺癌根治術中的應用. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2021, 28(5): 514-518.
48.	Liang H, Liang W, Zhao L, et al. Robotic versus video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(2): 254-259.
49.	Lee HS, Jang HJ. Thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 24(2): 131-141.
50.	Tomlinson MA, Treasure T. Insertion of a chest drain: How to do it. Br J Hosp Med, 1997, 58(6): 248-252.
51.	Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, et al. Early chest tube removal after thoracoscopic esophagectomy with high output. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016, 26(1): 17-22.
52.	Zhang TX, Zhang Y, Liu ZD, et al. The volume threshold of 300 versus 100 ml/day for chest tube removal after pulmonary lobectomy: A meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2018, 27(5): 695-702.
53.	Xie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 mL/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 21(2): 200-205.
54.	周景海, 李坤, 李彥寧, 等. 肺癌、食管癌切除術后胸腔閉式引流管拔除時機的隨機對照研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2019, 26(9): 853-857.
55.	Zhang Y, Li H, Hu B, et al. A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy. World J Surg, 2014, 38(1): 60-67.
56.	Liao HC, Yang SM, Hung MH, et al. Thoracoscopic surgery without drainage tube placement for peripheral lung nodules. Ann Thorac Surg, 2020, 109(3): 887-893.
57.	曹雄, 韓彪, 馬敏杰, 等. 無管化治療方式在肺大皰切除術中的應用. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2019, 26(5): 436-439.
58.	Lesser T, Doenst T, Lehmann T, et al. Lung bioposy without pleural drainage. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2019, 116(19): 329-334.

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.
2. 趙云鵬, 叢波, 趙小剛, 等. 全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術與開胸肺葉切除術淋巴結清掃及生存的Meta分析. 中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2014, 30(8): 467-472.
3. Lee BE, Shapiro M, Rutledge JR, et al. Nodal upstaging in robotic and video assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for clinical N0 lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015, 100(1): 229-233.
4. Bao F, Zhang C, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(7): 1798-1803.
5. Oh DS, Reddy RM, Gorrepati ML, et al. Robotic-assisted, video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: Propensity-matched analysis of recent premier data. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 104(5): 1733-1740.
6. 劉星池, 許世廣, 劉博, 等. Ⅰ期非小細胞肺癌達芬奇機器人手術的療效分析. 中國肺癌雜志, 2018, 21(11): 849-856.
7. 馬繼龍, 金大成, 韓松辰, 等. 早期肺癌患者行達芬奇機器人與胸腔鏡肺癌根治術的病例對照研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2019, 26(1): 48-52.
8. Merritt RE, Kneuertz PJ, D'Souza DM. Successful transition to robotic-assisted lobectomy with previous proficiency in thoracoscopic lobectomy. Innovations (Phila), 2019, 14(3): 263-271.
9. Li JT, Liu PY, Huang J, et al. Perioperative outcomes of radical lobectomies using robotic-assisted thoracoscopic technique vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic technique:Retrospective study of 1, 075 consecutive p-stageⅠnon-small cell lung cancer cases. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(3): 882-891.
10. Li C, Hu Y, Huang J, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted lobectomy with video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage ⅡB-ⅢA non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2019, 8(6): 820-828.
11. 同李平, 鄭曉慶, 段鴻濤, 等. 達芬奇機器人左肺上葉切除術治療肺癌的近期臨床效果分析. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2020, 27(2): 183-189.
12. 黃志剛, 吳彥崢, 劉亞鋒, 等. 達芬奇機器人輔助胸腔鏡肺葉切除術對肺癌患者心肺功能和生存質量的影響分析. 中國醫學前沿雜志(電子版), 2020, 12(5): 85-89.
13. 田禹, 黃佳, 陸佩吉, 等. 機器人輔助與胸腔鏡輔助右肺上葉切除術治療非小細胞肺癌的回顧性隊列研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2020, 27(10): 1134-1139.
14. Veluswamy RR, Whittaker Brown SA, Mhango G, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery for resectable lung cancer in older patients. Chest, 2020, 157(5): 1313-1321.
15. Zhou Q, Huang J, Pan F, et al. Operative outcomes and long-term survival of robotic-assisted segmentectomy for stage ⅠA lung cancer compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2020, 9(2): 306-315.
16. Haruki T, Kubouchi Y, Takagi Y, et al. Comparison of medium-term survival outcomes between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in treating primary lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 68(9): 984-992.
17. Zhang Y, Chen C, Hu J, et al. Early outcomes of robotic versus thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 160(5): 1363-1372.
18. Qiu T, Zhao Y, Xuan Y, et al. Robotic sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-weighted comparison with thoracoscopic and open surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2020, 160(3): 838-846.
19. Kneuertz PJ, D'Souza DM, Richardson M, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after robotic lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy approach. Clin Lung Cancer, 2020, 21(3): 214-224.
20. Bodner J, Schmid T, Augustin F, et al. Minimally invasive approaches for lung lobectomy—From VATS to robotic and back. Eur Surg, 2011, 43(4): 224-228.
21. Deen SA, Wilson JL, Wilshire CL, et al. Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: A comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(3): 1000-1007.
22. Demir A, Ayalp K, Ozkan B, et al. Robotic and video-assisted thoracic surgery lung segmentectomy for malignant and benign lesions. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 20(3): 304-309.
23. He Y, Coonar A, Gelvez-Zapata S, et al. Evaluation of a robot-assisted video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery programme. Exp Ther Med, 2014, 7(4): 873-876.
24. Jang HJ, Lee HS, Park SY, et al. Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: A single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila), 2011, 6(5): 305-310.
25. Lee BE, Korst RJ, Kletsman E, et al. Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: Are there outcomes advantages? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147(2): 724-729.
26. Louie BE, Wilson JL, Kim S, et al. Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches for clinical stageⅠ and stageⅡnon-small cell lung cancer using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 102(3): 917-924.
27. Mahieu J, Rinieri P, Bubenheim M, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung lobectomy: Can a robotic approach improve short-term outcomes and operative safety? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016, 64(4): 354-362.
28. Mungo B, Hooker CM, Ho JS, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic resection for lung cancer: Early results of a new robotic program. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016, 26(4): 243-248.
29. Swanson SJ, Miller DL, McKenna RJ, et al. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: Results from a multihospital database (Premier). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147(3): 929-937.
30. Yang CF, Sun Z, Speicher PJ, et al. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stageⅠ non-small cell lung cancer in the national cancer data base. Ann Thorac Surg, 2016, 101(3): 1037-1042.
31. Yang HX, Woo KM, Sima CS, et al. Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stageⅠnonsmall cell lung cancer: Comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(2): 431-437.
32. 郭洪撥, 喻本桐. 機器人與胸腔鏡肺葉切除術在治療早期非小細胞肺癌的安全性與療效對比. 實用醫學雜志, 2019, 35(4): 541-545.
33. 何天煜, 王鶯, 劉佳聰, 等. VATS與RATS精準解剖的亞肺葉聯合切除術的回顧性隊列研究. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2022, 3(1): 4-14.
34. 倪恒, 陸豪健, 王一青, 等. 機器人與胸腔鏡袖式肺葉切除術治療非小細胞肺癌的比較研究. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2022, 3(1): 15-21.
35. 柴新春, 許世廣, 劉博, 等. ⅠA期非小細胞肺癌行達芬奇機器人和電視胸腔鏡肺段切除術近期療效對比分析. 中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2021, 37(11): 644-648.
36. 張真發, 岳東升, 王勐, 等. 達芬奇機器人系統與胸腔鏡在肺癌根治術中的近期療效比較及經驗探討. 中國腫瘤臨床, 2021, 48(10): 511-515.
37. 薛家龍, 徐惟, 劉星池, 等. 達芬奇機器人與電視胸腔鏡手術對非小細胞肺癌患者術后免疫功能影響的對比研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2021, 28(5): 534-539.
38. 李青元, 陶紹霖, 康珀銘, 等. 機器人與胸腔鏡肺葉切除對非小細胞肺癌患者機體創傷及淋巴細胞亞群的影響. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2021, 28(3): 299-304.
39. 葉貫超, 劉亞飛, 張春敭, 等. 達芬奇機器人與胸腔鏡肺段切除術治療早期非小細胞肺癌的有效性對比. 機器人外科學雜志(中英文), 2021, 2(1): 1-9.
40. 吳曉, 徐金明, 王鶯, 等. 機器人與胸腔鏡肺段切除術治療非小細胞肺癌的傾向性評分匹配研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2020, 27(10): 1150-1154.
41. 謝博恒, 隋天一, 秦毅, 等. 機器人輔助與電視輔助胸腔鏡肺段切除術治療早期非小細胞肺癌短期效果比較. 中國肺癌雜志, 2019, 22(12): 767-771.
42. 代鋒, 許世廣, 徐惟, 等. 達芬奇機器人與電視胸腔鏡輔助非小細胞肺癌根治術近期療效配對的病例對照研究. 中國肺癌雜志, 2018, 21(3): 206-211.
43. 楊倫, 喻本桐, 張智, 等. 達芬奇機器人與胸腔鏡根治手術治療非小細胞肺癌效果比較. 濰坊醫學院學報, 2018, 40(1): 73-75.
44. 成名, 許世廣, 徐惟, 等. 機器人輔助與胸腔鏡非小細胞肺癌手術近遠期生存比較. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2022, 29(9): 1133-1139.
45. Rajaram R, Mohanty S, Bentrem DJ, et al. Nationwide assessment of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2017, 103(4): 1092-1100.
46. Augustin F, Bodner J, Maier H, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: Comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2013, 398(6): 895-901.
47. 賀生亮, 郭天康, 柏啟州, 等. 達芬奇機器人系統在高齡患者肺癌根治術中的應用. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2021, 28(5): 514-518.
48. Liang H, Liang W, Zhao L, et al. Robotic versus video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy for lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(2): 254-259.
49. Lee HS, Jang HJ. Thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection for lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012, 24(2): 131-141.
50. Tomlinson MA, Treasure T. Insertion of a chest drain: How to do it. Br J Hosp Med, 1997, 58(6): 248-252.
51. Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, et al. Early chest tube removal after thoracoscopic esophagectomy with high output. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016, 26(1): 17-22.
52. Zhang TX, Zhang Y, Liu ZD, et al. The volume threshold of 300 versus 100 ml/day for chest tube removal after pulmonary lobectomy: A meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2018, 27(5): 695-702.
53. Xie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, et al. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 mL/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 21(2): 200-205.
54. 周景海, 李坤, 李彥寧, 等. 肺癌、食管癌切除術后胸腔閉式引流管拔除時機的隨機對照研究. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2019, 26(9): 853-857.
55. Zhang Y, Li H, Hu B, et al. A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy. World J Surg, 2014, 38(1): 60-67.
56. Liao HC, Yang SM, Hung MH, et al. Thoracoscopic surgery without drainage tube placement for peripheral lung nodules. Ann Thorac Surg, 2020, 109(3): 887-893.
57. 曹雄, 韓彪, 馬敏杰, 等. 無管化治療方式在肺大皰切除術中的應用. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2019, 26(5): 436-439.
58. Lesser T, Doenst T, Lehmann T, et al. Lung bioposy without pleural drainage. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2019, 116(19): 329-334.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Da-Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content