Establishment of an evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability_Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Authors：

WANG Zihao , WANG Fuqiang , ZHANG Hanlu , ZHENG Yu ,  WANG Yun

Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

WANG Yun, Email: 2237454336@qq.com

Keywords：

Thoracoscope; Delphi method; evaluation; reliability; validity

DOI：

10.7507/1007-4848.201912037

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective By establishing a set of evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability, to evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different brands of thoracoscopes, and to provide some suggestions for the innovation and upgrade of thoracoscopes, especially for the domestic thoracoscopes.Methods The project coordination team initially formulated the evaluation index system for the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscope by querying literature and brainstorming. The Delphi expert consultation method was used to distribute questionnaires to the selected experts. Experts provided scores which were based on the importance of each indicator, and clarified the basis of their judgment and the familiarity with the evaluation indicators. After two rounds of screening by Delphi method, a thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability satisfactory questionnaire was formed. The appropriate sample for pre-investigation was selected, and the reliability and validity were tested. The index composition was adjusted based on the results of the test to form a final evaluation scale.Results The project coordination team initially formulated 24 thoracoscope-related evaluation indicators. After two rounds of experts consultation, the item "brightness adjustment" was deleted without any additional entries. The positive coefficients of the experts in the first round and the second round were 100.0% and 80.0%, respectively. The two rounds of authoritative coefficients were 0.86 and 0.90, and the coordination coefficients were 0.272 (P<0.001) and 0.523 (P<0.001), respectively. A total of 140 questionnaires were issued in this pre-investigation. The recovery rate was 100.0% and the effective rate was 90.0%. The Cronbach's α value of the scale was 0.936, and the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient was 0.972. The factor analysis finally extracted 3 common factors. The total variance of the cumulative interpretation was 70.9%. The three common factors were named "operation related", "image related" and "device related".Conclusion The evaluation index system developed in this study has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to evaluate the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscopes.

Citation： WANG Zihao, WANG Fuqiang, ZHANG Hanlu, ZHENG Yu, WANG Yun. Establishment of an evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2020, 27(8): 893-899. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.201912037 Copy

1.	蔡天智, 陳婧婧. 2015 年我國內窺鏡貿易分析. 中國醫療器械信息, 2016, 22(11): 21-25.
2.	周方, 邱曉力, 方定, 等. 國產硬性內窺鏡在基層醫院的應用與評價. 中國醫療設備, 2016, 31(1): 86-88.
3.	陳宇軒, 白楊, 葉山亮, 等. 德爾菲法確定膠囊內鏡圖像質量影響因素權重系數的研究. 中國內鏡雜志, 2012, 18(12): 1256-1259.
4.	唐小嬋, 周洵, 楊蘭, 等. 基于德爾菲法探討分析苗醫肺架痛癥. 中國民族民間醫藥, 2019, 28(23): 12-15.
5.	何旭文, 馮玉韜, 劉國蓮, 等. 基于德爾菲法的社區護士實踐技能指標體系的構建研究. 護理研究, 2019, 33(18): 3227-3230.
6.	王春枝, 斯琴. 德爾菲法中的數據統計處理方法及其應用研究. 內蒙古財經學院學報(綜合版), 2011, 9(4): 92-96.
7.	宋婷, 郭偉, 尤繼芹, 等. 基于德爾菲法的重癥監護室患者家屬賦能心理護理量表構建. 中西醫結合護理(中英文), 2018, 4(10): 45-48.
8.	柯思思, 朱朝陽, 張剛, 等. 應用德爾菲法構建醫院突發公共衛生事件應對能力評價指標體系. 中國社會醫學雜志, 2019, 36(6): 643-646.
9.	姚丹霓, 何澤慧, 盧傳堅, 等. 基于尋常性銀屑病患者報告結局評價量表的研制及其信度和效度評價. 中國皮膚性病學雜志, 2017, 31(1): 82-86.
10.	林燕平, 邱金花, 林寧, 等. 護士交接班評估量表的漢化及信效度檢測. 中華護理雜志, 2015, 50(4): 404-407.
11.	劉秀榮, 劉勇, 張本金, 等. 中文創業人格問卷測評大學生樣本的效度和信度. 中國臨床心理學雜志, 2020, 28(1): 11-15.
12.	王倩, 王燕, 高健, 等. 肝硬化患者自我管理行為量表的研制. 中華護理雜志, 2014, 49(12): 1515-1520.
13.	劉萬里, 賀連香. PICC 專科護士臨床相關能力評估量表的編制及信效度分析. 護理學報, 2016, 23(1): 1-6.
14.	許世梅. 碩士研究生專業認同量表編制及信效度分析. 北京化工大學學報(社會科學版), 2018, 1: 106-110.
15.	陳婧婧, 蔡天智. 2014 年我國內窺鏡產業發展分析. 中國醫療器械信息, 2015, 21(10): 16-21.
16.	Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, et al. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology, 2010, 75(3): 534-538.
17.	Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol, 2006, 176(1): 137-141.
18.	劉霞, 王軍永, 王素珍, 等. 基于德爾菲法的基本診療路徑效果評價指標體系構建過程淺析. 江西中醫藥, 2019, 50(12): 13-16.
19.	許國祥. 統計預測與決策. 上海: 上海財經大學出版社, 2005. 11.
20.	王瑞芳, 李春玲, 李敏, 等. 基于德爾菲法的胰體尾切除術圍手術期臨床護理路徑表的構建. 上海護理, 2019, 19(5): 46-50.
21.	胡慧秀, 王志穩, 李穎堃, 等. 養老機構老年人關懷行為評價量表編制及信效度檢驗. 中華護理雜志, 2015, 50(8): 912-916.

1. 蔡天智, 陳婧婧. 2015 年我國內窺鏡貿易分析. 中國醫療器械信息, 2016, 22(11): 21-25.
2. 周方, 邱曉力, 方定, 等. 國產硬性內窺鏡在基層醫院的應用與評價. 中國醫療設備, 2016, 31(1): 86-88.
3. 陳宇軒, 白楊, 葉山亮, 等. 德爾菲法確定膠囊內鏡圖像質量影響因素權重系數的研究. 中國內鏡雜志, 2012, 18(12): 1256-1259.
4. 唐小嬋, 周洵, 楊蘭, 等. 基于德爾菲法探討分析苗醫肺架痛癥. 中國民族民間醫藥, 2019, 28(23): 12-15.
5. 何旭文, 馮玉韜, 劉國蓮, 等. 基于德爾菲法的社區護士實踐技能指標體系的構建研究. 護理研究, 2019, 33(18): 3227-3230.
6. 王春枝, 斯琴. 德爾菲法中的數據統計處理方法及其應用研究. 內蒙古財經學院學報(綜合版), 2011, 9(4): 92-96.
7. 宋婷, 郭偉, 尤繼芹, 等. 基于德爾菲法的重癥監護室患者家屬賦能心理護理量表構建. 中西醫結合護理(中英文), 2018, 4(10): 45-48.
8. 柯思思, 朱朝陽, 張剛, 等. 應用德爾菲法構建醫院突發公共衛生事件應對能力評價指標體系. 中國社會醫學雜志, 2019, 36(6): 643-646.
9. 姚丹霓, 何澤慧, 盧傳堅, 等. 基于尋常性銀屑病患者報告結局評價量表的研制及其信度和效度評價. 中國皮膚性病學雜志, 2017, 31(1): 82-86.
10. 林燕平, 邱金花, 林寧, 等. 護士交接班評估量表的漢化及信效度檢測. 中華護理雜志, 2015, 50(4): 404-407.
11. 劉秀榮, 劉勇, 張本金, 等. 中文創業人格問卷測評大學生樣本的效度和信度. 中國臨床心理學雜志, 2020, 28(1): 11-15.
12. 王倩, 王燕, 高健, 等. 肝硬化患者自我管理行為量表的研制. 中華護理雜志, 2014, 49(12): 1515-1520.
13. 劉萬里, 賀連香. PICC 專科護士臨床相關能力評估量表的編制及信效度分析. 護理學報, 2016, 23(1): 1-6.
14. 許世梅. 碩士研究生專業認同量表編制及信效度分析. 北京化工大學學報(社會科學版), 2018, 1: 106-110.
15. 陳婧婧, 蔡天智. 2014 年我國內窺鏡產業發展分析. 中國醫療器械信息, 2015, 21(10): 16-21.
16. Knudsen B, Miyaoka R, Shah K, et al. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. Urology, 2010, 75(3): 534-538.
17. Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol, 2006, 176(1): 137-141.
18. 劉霞, 王軍永, 王素珍, 等. 基于德爾菲法的基本診療路徑效果評價指標體系構建過程淺析. 江西中醫藥, 2019, 50(12): 13-16.
19. 許國祥. 統計預測與決策. 上海: 上海財經大學出版社, 2005. 11.
20. 王瑞芳, 李春玲, 李敏, 等. 基于德爾菲法的胰體尾切除術圍手術期臨床護理路徑表的構建. 上海護理, 2019, 19(5): 46-50.
21. 胡慧秀, 王志穩, 李穎堃, 等. 養老機構老年人關懷行為評價量表編制及信效度檢驗. 中華護理雜志, 2015, 50(8): 912-916.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Establishment of an evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content