Application of GK Bileaflet Mechanical Valve in Mitral Valve Replacement: A Case Control Study_Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Authors：

ZHANGWei-hua ¹ , LIJie ¹ , ZHANGXin ¹ , ZHANGLiang ¹ , ZHUYao-bin ² , LUOHong ¹ , MANing ¹ , LIUDong-hai ¹ , ZANGSu-hua ¹ ,  QIAOChen-hui ¹ , LIJi-feng ³

1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, P. R. China;
2. Pediatric Heart Center, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing 100029, P. R. China;
3. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zhengzhou Yihe Hospital, Zhengzhou 450047, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

QIAOChen-hui, Email: qchenhui@hotmail.com

Keywords：

GK bileaflet mechanical valve; Mitral valve replacement; Function evaluation

DOI：

10.7507/1007-4848.20160231

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of GK bileaflet mechanical valve applied in mitral valve replacement. Methods Twenty patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis underwent mitral valve replacement in our hospital from March 2008 to June 2011. Ten patients of them chose GK bileaflet mechanical valve for surgery (a GK group, 5 males and 5 females, aged 56.4±8.9 years), while the other 10 patients chose Medtronic Open Pivot mechanical valve (a Medtronic group, 4 males and 6 females, aged 50.2±8.0 years). The preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were performed to evaluate leaflets opening angle, the morphological features of the mechanical valve and the hemodynamic features in the third year after surgery during the follow-up. Results No mortality, defect, low cardiac output syndrome or bleeding after surgery occurred in either group. The result of 3-year follow-up showed that the function of the mechanical valve showed no difference between the two groups. Cardiac CTA and TEE showed good morphological features in all patients. Conclusion The GK bileaflet mechanical valve has equivalent effect as Medtronic Open Pivot mechanical valve for mitral valve replacement during the 3-year follow-up.

Citation： ZHANG Wei-hua, LI Jie, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Liang, ZHU Yao-bin, LUO Hong, MA Ning, LIU Dong-hai, ZANG Su-hua, QIAO Chen-hui, LI Ji-feng. Application of GK Bileaflet Mechanical Valve in Mitral Valve Replacement: A Case Control Study. Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2016, 23(10): 965-968. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.20160231 Copy

1.	Nishida T, Tominaga R. A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 61(4): 182-190.
2.	Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, et al.Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States : results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 87(5): 1431-1439.
3.	Kaneko T, Cohn LC, Aranki SF. Tissue valve is the preferred option for patients aged 60 and older. Circulation, 2013, 128(12): 1365-1371.
4.	Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(19): 2451-2496.
5.	Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(1): e1-e132.
6.	Nishida T, Sonoda H, Oishi Y, et al. Mechanical prosthesis is reasonable for mitralvalve replacement in patients approximately 65 years of age. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 96(5): 1614-1620.
7.	Kaneko T, Aranki S, Javed Q, et al. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147(1): 117-126.
8.	Baykut D, Grize L, Schindler C, et al. Eleven-year single-center experience with the ATS Open Pivot Bileaflet heart valve. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 82(3): 847-852.
9.	Van Nooten GJ, Bové T, Van Belleghem Y, et al. Twenty-year single-center experience with the medtronic open pivot mechanical heart valve. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(4): 1306-1313.
10.	Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, et al. Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 139(6): 1494-1500.
11.	Van Nooten GJ, Caes F, Fran?ois K, et al. Fifteen years' single-center experience with the ATS bileaflet valve. J Heart Valve Dis, 2009, 18(4):444-452.
12.	Sezai A, Shiono M, Sezai Y, et al. Evaluation of valve sound and its effects on ATS prosthetic valves patients' quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000, 69: 507-512.
13.	曹華, 丘智煌. 535例GK雙葉機械瓣的臨床應用分析. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2011, 18(6): 568-570.
14.	鄔曉臣, 歐陽輝, 張近寶, 等. 國產思達機械瓣膜的臨床應用與隨訪. 西南國防醫藥, 2013, 23(10): 1060-1062.
15.	Blauwet LA, Malouf JF, Connolly HM, et al. Comprehensive hemodynamic assessment of 368 normal St. Jude Medical mechanical mitral valve prostheses based on early postimplantation echocardiographic studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2013, 26(4): 381-389.
16.	張麗君, 張兆琪, 王永梅, 等. 雙源CT在主動脈瓣置換術后機械瓣評估中的應用價值. 中華放射學雜志, 2010, 44(7): 704-710.
17.	Rahimtola SH, Murphy E. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Br Heart J, 1981, 45(3):331-335.
18.	Von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Rudolph A, Wassmuth R, et al. Assessment of mitral bioprosthesis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2010, 12(1): 36-44.
19.	Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: An Update. Currgardiol Rep, 2011, 13(3): 250-257.
20.	Attisani M, Pellegrini A, Sorrentino P, et al. Enlargement of mitral valve ring in a young women with severe prosthesis-patient mismatch. Heart surg Form, 2014, 17(2): E61-E63.

1. Nishida T, Tominaga R. A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 61(4): 182-190.
2. Gammie JS, Sheng S, Griffith BP, et al.Trends in mitral valve surgery in the United States : results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 87(5): 1431-1439.
3. Kaneko T, Cohn LC, Aranki SF. Tissue valve is the preferred option for patients aged 60 and older. Circulation, 2013, 128(12): 1365-1371.
4. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(19): 2451-2496.
5. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 148(1): e1-e132.
6. Nishida T, Sonoda H, Oishi Y, et al. Mechanical prosthesis is reasonable for mitralvalve replacement in patients approximately 65 years of age. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 96(5): 1614-1620.
7. Kaneko T, Aranki S, Javed Q, et al. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014, 147(1): 117-126.
8. Baykut D, Grize L, Schindler C, et al. Eleven-year single-center experience with the ATS Open Pivot Bileaflet heart valve. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006, 82(3): 847-852.
9. Van Nooten GJ, Bové T, Van Belleghem Y, et al. Twenty-year single-center experience with the medtronic open pivot mechanical heart valve. Ann Thorac Surg, 2014, 97(4): 1306-1313.
10. Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, et al. Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 139(6): 1494-1500.
11. Van Nooten GJ, Caes F, Fran?ois K, et al. Fifteen years' single-center experience with the ATS bileaflet valve. J Heart Valve Dis, 2009, 18(4):444-452.
12. Sezai A, Shiono M, Sezai Y, et al. Evaluation of valve sound and its effects on ATS prosthetic valves patients' quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg, 2000, 69: 507-512.
13. 曹華, 丘智煌. 535例GK雙葉機械瓣的臨床應用分析. 中國胸心血管外科臨床雜志, 2011, 18(6): 568-570.
14. 鄔曉臣, 歐陽輝, 張近寶, 等. 國產思達機械瓣膜的臨床應用與隨訪. 西南國防醫藥, 2013, 23(10): 1060-1062.
15. Blauwet LA, Malouf JF, Connolly HM, et al. Comprehensive hemodynamic assessment of 368 normal St. Jude Medical mechanical mitral valve prostheses based on early postimplantation echocardiographic studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2013, 26(4): 381-389.
16. 張麗君, 張兆琪, 王永梅, 等. 雙源CT在主動脈瓣置換術后機械瓣評估中的應用價值. 中華放射學雜志, 2010, 44(7): 704-710.
17. Rahimtola SH, Murphy E. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Br Heart J, 1981, 45(3):331-335.
18. Von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Rudolph A, Wassmuth R, et al. Assessment of mitral bioprosthesis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2010, 12(1): 36-44.
19. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: An Update. Currgardiol Rep, 2011, 13(3): 250-257.
20. Attisani M, Pellegrini A, Sorrentino P, et al. Enlargement of mitral valve ring in a young women with severe prosthesis-patient mismatch. Heart surg Form, 2014, 17(2): E61-E63.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Application of GK Bileaflet Mechanical Valve in Mitral Valve Replacement: A Case Control Study

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content