| 1. | St Mart JP, de Steiger RN, Cuthbert A, et al. The three-year survivorship of robotically assisted versus non-robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 2020, 102-B(3): 319-328. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 2. | Leelasestaporn C, Tarnpichprasert T, Arirachakaran A, et al. Comparison of 1-year outcomes between MAKO versus NAVIO robot-assisted medial UKA: nonrandomized, prospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Relat Res, 2020, 32(1): 13. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00030-x. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 3. | Wada K, Hamada D, Takasago T, et al. Native rotational knee kinematics is restored after lateral UKA but not after medial UKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(11): 3438-3443. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 4. | Lonner JH, Klement MR. Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Optoions and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2019, 27(5): e207-e214. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 5. | Lonner JH. Robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with a handheld image-free sculpting tool. Orthop Clin North Am, 2016, 47(1): 29-40. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 6. | Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2006, 88(2): 188-197. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 7. | Porcelli P, Marmotti A, Bellato E, et al. Comparing different approaches in robotic-assisted surgery for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcomes at a short-term follow-up of MAKO versus NAVIO system. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents, 2020, 34(4 Suppl 3): 393-404. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 8. | Alnachoukati OK, Barrington JW, Berend KR, et al. Eight hundred twenty-five medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: The first 10-year US multi-center survival analysis. J Arthroplasty, 2018, 33(3): 677-683. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 9. | Emerson RH, Alnachoukati O, Barrington J, et al. The results of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States: a mean ten-year survival analysis. Bone Joint J, 2016, 98-B(10 Supple B): 34-40. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 10. | Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, et al. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2016, 98(8): 627-635. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 11. | Di Benedetto P, Buttironi MM, Magnanelli S, et al. Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data. Acta Biomed, 2019, 90(12-S): 104-108. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 12. | Ponzio DY, Lonner JH. Robotic technology produces more conservative tibial resection than conventional techniques in UKA. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2016, 45(7): E465-E468. | 
				                                                        
				                                                            
				                                                                | 13. | Park KK, Han CD, Yang IH, et al. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can reduce radiologic outliers compared to conventional techniques. PLoS One, 2019, 14(12): e0225941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225941. |