Selection principles and application status of surgical methods for hip fracture in the elderly_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

DING Tao ¹ , ZHANG Baokun ² , TIAN Shaoqi ¹ , WANG Yuanhe ¹ ,  SUN Kang ¹

1. Department of Articular Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao Shandong, 266555, P.R.China;
2. Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200233, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

SUN Kang, Email: sunkang_qy@aliyun.com

Keywords：

Femoral neck fracture; intertrochanteric fracture; internal fixator; hip arthroplasty; elderly patients

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.201804084

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To summarize the selection criteria and clinical application of surgical methods for hip fractures (femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture) in the elderly. Methods The related literature concerning the surgical methods for femoral neck fracture and intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly at home and abroad was extensively reviewed and summarized. Results Among the elderly patients with femoral neck fracture, the closed reduction and internal fixation or dynamic hip screw (DHS), and total hip arthroplasty are recommended for patients under 65 years old and 65–80 years old respectively and without special surgical contraindication; whereas hemiarthroplasty is recommended for patients with poor physical conditions. Among the patients with intertrochanteric fracture, DHS or the 3rd generation of Gamma nails is recommended for patients with stable fracture while the intramedullary fixation systems (e.g., proximal femoral nail anti-rotation, intertrochanteric antegrade nail) and the extramedullary fixation systems (e.g., proximal femoral locking compression plate and less invasive stabilization system) can be applied to the patients with unstable fracture according to the fracture type and bone conditions. Notably, hip arthroplasty is recommended for elderly patients with comminuted fracture. Conclusion The surgical method and internal fixator should be chosen according to the fracture type and bone condition in the elderly in order to improve the effectiveness and reduce the complication.

Citation： DING Tao, ZHANG Baokun, TIAN Shaoqi, WANG Yuanhe, SUN Kang. Selection principles and application status of surgical methods for hip fracture in the elderly. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2018, 32(11): 1435-1440. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201804084 Copy

1.	Close JD, Swartz K, Deu R. Hip fracture in older patients: tips and tools to speed recovery. J Fam Pract, 2013, 62(9): 484-92.
2.	Leonardsson O, Rolfson O, Hommel A, et al. Patient-reported outcome after displaced femoral neck fracture: a national survey of 4467 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(18): 1693-1699.
3.	Hedbeck CJ, Inngul C, Blomfeldt R, et al. Internal fixation versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in patients with severe cognitive dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma, 2013, 27(12): 690-695.
4.	Parvizi J, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG. Thirty-day mortality following hip arthroplasty for acute fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2004, 86-A(9): 1983-1988.
5.	Inngul C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, et al. Cemented versus uncemented arthroplasty in patients with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(11): 1475-1480.
6.	Blomfeldt R, T?rnkvist H, Eriksson K, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2007, 89(2): 160-165.
7.	Hopley C, Stengel D, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review. BMJ, 2010, 340: c2332.
8.	He JH, Zhou CP, Zhou ZK, et al. Meta-analysis comparing total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 70 years old. Chin J Traumatol, 2012, 15(4): 195-200.
9.	LaBelle LW, Colwill JC, Swanson AB. Bateman bipolar hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. A five- to ten-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1990, (251): 20-25.
10.	Zi-Sheng A, You-Shui G, Zhi-Zhen J, et al. Hemiarthroplasty vs primary total hip arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in the elderly: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(4): 583-590.
11.	Uhler LM, Schultz WR, Hill AD, et al. Health utility of early hemiarthroplasty vs delayed total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients: A Markov model. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(5): 1434-1438.
12.	許猛, 張立海, 毛智, 等. 三種手術方式治療老年移位型股骨頸骨折療效比較. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2010, 24(12): 1419-1423.
13.	Raaymakers EL. Fractures of the femoral neck: a review and personal statement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2006, 73(1): 45-59.
14.	Yang JJ, Lin LC, Chao KH, et al. Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(1): 61-69.
15.	Ga?par D, Crnkovi? T, Durovi? D, et al. AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems of femoral neck fractures: are they reliable and reproducible? Med Glas (Zenica), 2012, 9(2): 243-247.
16.	Oakey JW, Stover MD, Summers HD, et al. Does screw configuration affect subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 443: 302-306.
17.	干耀愷, 唐堅, 孫月華. 股骨頸骨折內固定治療選擇. 國際骨科學雜志, 2013, 34(6): 396-398.
18.	Morris AH, Zuckerman JD, AAOS Council of Health Policy and Practice, U SA. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. National consensus conference on improving the continuum of care for patients with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2002, 84-A(4): 670-674.
19.	Jackman JM, Watson JT. Hip fractures in older men. Clin Geriatr Med, 2010, 26(2): 311-329.
20.	Mardani-Kivi M, Mirbolook A, Khajeh Jahromi S, et al. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: dynamic hip screw versus locking compression plate. Trauma Mon, 2013, 18(2): 67-70.
21.	Zhang CQ, Sun Y, Jin DX, et al. Reverse LISS plating for intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2010, 11: 166.
22.	Butler M, Forte ML, Joglekar SB, et al. Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2011, 93(12): 1104-1115.
23.	Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury, 2008, 39(8): 932-939.
24.	Lenich A, Vester H, Nerlich M, et al. Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip-Blade vs screw. Injury, 2010, 41(12): 1292-1296.
25.	Clawson DK. Trochanteric fractures treated by the sliding screw plate fixation method. J Trauma, 1964, 4: 737-752.
26.	O'Malley NT, Deeb AP, Bingham KW, et al. Outcome of the dynamic helical hip screw system for intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly patients. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2012, 3(2): 68-73.
27.	Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures Int Orthop, 2006, 30(2): 69-78.
28.	Saarenp?? I, Heikkinen T, Ristiniemi J, et al. Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients. Int Orthop, 2009, 33(1): 255-260.
29.	王勇, 楊益宇, 于志華, 等. 股骨近段鎖定鋼板治療老年股骨粗隆間骨折的對比研究. 中國骨傷, 2011, 24(5): 370-373.
30.	李壇珠, 張保焜, 莫小聯, 等. 極高齡不穩定股骨粗隆間骨折的髓內和髓外固定療效比較. 中華老年骨科與康復電子雜志, 2017, 3(1): 17-21.
31.	Kumar R, Singh RN, Singh BN. Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2012, 3(1): 28-36.
32.	Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008, (3): CD000093.
33.	Georgiannos D, Lampridis V, Bisbinas I. Complications following treatment of trochanteric fractures with the Gamma3 nail: is the latest version of Gamma nail superior to its predecessor? Surg Res Prac, 2014, 2014: 143598.
34.	Westacott D, Bould M. Outcome in 36 elderly patients treated with the Gamma3 long nail for unstable proximal femoral fracture. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 2011, 77(1): 68-72.
35.	Nüchtern JV, Ruecker AH, Sellenschloh K, et al. Malpositioning of the lag screws by 1- or 2-screw nailing systems for pertrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical comparison of gamma 3 and intertan. J Orthop Trauma, 2014, 28(5): 276-282.
36.	Vaquero J, Munoz J, Prat S, et al. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus Gamma3 nail for intramedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures. A randomised comparative study. Injury, 2012, 43(Suppl 2): S47-54.
37.	George M, Stefanos K, Spyridon G, et al. Reply to letter to the editor: Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(4): 1395-1396.
38.	Zhang H, Zeng X, Zhang N, et al. INTERTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia for intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis. J Int Med Res, 2017, 45(4): 1297-1309.
39.	Wu D, Ren G, Peng C, et al. InterTan nail versus Gamma3 nail for intramedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures. Diagn Pathol, 2014, 9: 191.
40.	Wang Q, Yang X, He HZ, et al. Comparative study of InterTAN and dynamic hip screw in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric injury and wound. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014, 7(12): 5578-5582.
41.	Yang X, Wu Q, Wang X. Investigation of perioperative hidden blood loss of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly treated with different intramedullary fixations. Injury, 2017, 48(8): 1848-1852.
42.	Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, et al. Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre-operative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop, 2001, 25(6): 360-362.
43.	Sidhu AS, Singh AP, Singh AP, et al. Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(6): 789-792.
44.	Cankaya D, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY. Cemented calcar replacement versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2013, 19(6): 548-553.
45.	Celiktas M, Togrul E, Kose O. Calcar preservation arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly. Clin Orthop Surg, 2015, 7(4): 436-442.
46.	Fan L, Dang X, Wang K. Comparison between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e39531.

1. Close JD, Swartz K, Deu R. Hip fracture in older patients: tips and tools to speed recovery. J Fam Pract, 2013, 62(9): 484-92.
2. Leonardsson O, Rolfson O, Hommel A, et al. Patient-reported outcome after displaced femoral neck fracture: a national survey of 4467 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(18): 1693-1699.
3. Hedbeck CJ, Inngul C, Blomfeldt R, et al. Internal fixation versus cemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in patients with severe cognitive dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma, 2013, 27(12): 690-695.
4. Parvizi J, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG. Thirty-day mortality following hip arthroplasty for acute fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2004, 86-A(9): 1983-1988.
5. Inngul C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, et al. Cemented versus uncemented arthroplasty in patients with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 2015, 97-B(11): 1475-1480.
6. Blomfeldt R, T?rnkvist H, Eriksson K, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2007, 89(2): 160-165.
7. Hopley C, Stengel D, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older patients: systematic review. BMJ, 2010, 340: c2332.
8. He JH, Zhou CP, Zhou ZK, et al. Meta-analysis comparing total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 70 years old. Chin J Traumatol, 2012, 15(4): 195-200.
9. LaBelle LW, Colwill JC, Swanson AB. Bateman bipolar hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. A five- to ten-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1990, (251): 20-25.
10. Zi-Sheng A, You-Shui G, Zhi-Zhen J, et al. Hemiarthroplasty vs primary total hip arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck in the elderly: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(4): 583-590.
11. Uhler LM, Schultz WR, Hill AD, et al. Health utility of early hemiarthroplasty vs delayed total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients: A Markov model. J Arthroplasty, 2017, 32(5): 1434-1438.
12. 許猛, 張立海, 毛智, 等. 三種手術方式治療老年移位型股骨頸骨折療效比較. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2010, 24(12): 1419-1423.
13. Raaymakers EL. Fractures of the femoral neck: a review and personal statement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2006, 73(1): 45-59.
14. Yang JJ, Lin LC, Chao KH, et al. Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2013, 95(1): 61-69.
15. Ga?par D, Crnkovi? T, Durovi? D, et al. AO group, AO subgroup, Garden and Pauwels classification systems of femoral neck fractures: are they reliable and reproducible? Med Glas (Zenica), 2012, 9(2): 243-247.
16. Oakey JW, Stover MD, Summers HD, et al. Does screw configuration affect subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 443: 302-306.
17. 干耀愷, 唐堅, 孫月華. 股骨頸骨折內固定治療選擇. 國際骨科學雜志, 2013, 34(6): 396-398.
18. Morris AH, Zuckerman JD, AAOS Council of Health Policy and Practice, U SA. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. National consensus conference on improving the continuum of care for patients with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2002, 84-A(4): 670-674.
19. Jackman JM, Watson JT. Hip fractures in older men. Clin Geriatr Med, 2010, 26(2): 311-329.
20. Mardani-Kivi M, Mirbolook A, Khajeh Jahromi S, et al. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: dynamic hip screw versus locking compression plate. Trauma Mon, 2013, 18(2): 67-70.
21. Zhang CQ, Sun Y, Jin DX, et al. Reverse LISS plating for intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2010, 11: 166.
22. Butler M, Forte ML, Joglekar SB, et al. Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2011, 93(12): 1104-1115.
23. Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury, 2008, 39(8): 932-939.
24. Lenich A, Vester H, Nerlich M, et al. Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip-Blade vs screw. Injury, 2010, 41(12): 1292-1296.
25. Clawson DK. Trochanteric fractures treated by the sliding screw plate fixation method. J Trauma, 1964, 4: 737-752.
26. O'Malley NT, Deeb AP, Bingham KW, et al. Outcome of the dynamic helical hip screw system for intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly patients. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2012, 3(2): 68-73.
27. Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures Int Orthop, 2006, 30(2): 69-78.
28. Saarenp?? I, Heikkinen T, Ristiniemi J, et al. Functional comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail in trochanteric hip fractures: a matched-pair study of 268 patients. Int Orthop, 2009, 33(1): 255-260.
29. 王勇, 楊益宇, 于志華, 等. 股骨近段鎖定鋼板治療老年股骨粗隆間骨折的對比研究. 中國骨傷, 2011, 24(5): 370-373.
30. 李壇珠, 張保焜, 莫小聯, 等. 極高齡不穩定股骨粗隆間骨折的髓內和髓外固定療效比較. 中華老年骨科與康復電子雜志, 2017, 3(1): 17-21.
31. Kumar R, Singh RN, Singh BN. Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2012, 3(1): 28-36.
32. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008, (3): CD000093.
33. Georgiannos D, Lampridis V, Bisbinas I. Complications following treatment of trochanteric fractures with the Gamma3 nail: is the latest version of Gamma nail superior to its predecessor? Surg Res Prac, 2014, 2014: 143598.
34. Westacott D, Bould M. Outcome in 36 elderly patients treated with the Gamma3 long nail for unstable proximal femoral fracture. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 2011, 77(1): 68-72.
35. Nüchtern JV, Ruecker AH, Sellenschloh K, et al. Malpositioning of the lag screws by 1- or 2-screw nailing systems for pertrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical comparison of gamma 3 and intertan. J Orthop Trauma, 2014, 28(5): 276-282.
36. Vaquero J, Munoz J, Prat S, et al. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus Gamma3 nail for intramedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures. A randomised comparative study. Injury, 2012, 43(Suppl 2): S47-54.
37. George M, Stefanos K, Spyridon G, et al. Reply to letter to the editor: Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(4): 1395-1396.
38. Zhang H, Zeng X, Zhang N, et al. INTERTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia for intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis. J Int Med Res, 2017, 45(4): 1297-1309.
39. Wu D, Ren G, Peng C, et al. InterTan nail versus Gamma3 nail for intramedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures. Diagn Pathol, 2014, 9: 191.
40. Wang Q, Yang X, He HZ, et al. Comparative study of InterTAN and dynamic hip screw in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric injury and wound. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014, 7(12): 5578-5582.
41. Yang X, Wu Q, Wang X. Investigation of perioperative hidden blood loss of unstable intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly treated with different intramedullary fixations. Injury, 2017, 48(8): 1848-1852.
42. Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, et al. Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre-operative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop, 2001, 25(6): 360-362.
43. Sidhu AS, Singh AP, Singh AP, et al. Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(6): 789-792.
44. Cankaya D, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY. Cemented calcar replacement versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2013, 19(6): 548-553.
45. Celiktas M, Togrul E, Kose O. Calcar preservation arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly. Clin Orthop Surg, 2015, 7(4): 436-442.
46. Fan L, Dang X, Wang K. Comparison between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e39531.

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Selection principles and application status of surgical methods for hip fracture in the elderly

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content