RESEARCH PROGRESS OF PERIPHERAL NERVE SURGERY ASSISTED BY Da Vinci ROBOTIC SYSTEM_Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

Authors：

SHENJie , SONGDiyu , WANGXiaoyu , WANGChangjiang ,  ZHANGShuming

Department of Orthopedics, the General Hospital of the PLA Rocket Force, Beijing, 100088, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

ZHANGShuming, Email: zsmep@tom.com

Keywords：

Peripheral nerve; Da Vinci robotic system; Microsurgery

DOI：

10.7507/1002-1892.20160051

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To summarize the research progress of peripheral nerve surgery assisted by Da Vinci robotic system. Methods The recent domestic and international articles about peripheral nerve surgery assisted by Da Vinci robotic system were reviewed and summarized. Results Compared with conventional microsurgery, peripheral nerve surgery assisted by Da Vinci robotic system has distinctive advantages, such as elimination of physiological tremors and three-dimensional high-resolution vision. It is possible to perform robot assisted limb nerve surgery using either the traditional brachial plexus approach or the mini-invasive approach. Conclusion The development of Da Vinci robotic system has revealed new perspectives in peripheral nerve surgery. But it has still been at the initial stage, more basic and clinical researches are still needed.

Citation： SHENJie, SONGDiyu, WANGXiaoyu, WANGChangjiang, ZHANGShuming. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF PERIPHERAL NERVE SURGERY ASSISTED BY Da Vinci ROBOTIC SYSTEM. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2016, 30(2): 258-261. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160051 Copy

1.	?Garcia JC Jr, Lebailly F, Mantovani G, et al. Telerobotic manipulation of the brachial plexus. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2012, 28(7):491-494.
2.	劉亞飛, 王偉, Anod Mani Regmi, 等. 鎖骨骨折合并臂叢損傷的早期顯微外科治療. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2014, 28(11):1329-1331.
3.	Modi P, Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR Jr. Robot-assisted cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2009, 9(3):500-505.
4.	杜詳民, 張永壽. 達芬奇手術機器人系統介紹及應用進展. 中國醫學裝備, 2011, 8(5):60-63.
5.	周寧新, 陳軍周, 劉全達, 等. "達芬奇"機器人普通外科手術180例:中國單中心報道. 中國普外基礎與臨床雜志, 2011, 18(7):698-704.
6.	Le Roux PD, Das H, Esuenazi S, et al. Robot-assisted microsurgery:a feasibility study in the rat. Neurosurgery, 2001, 48(3):584-589.
7.	Siemionow M, Ozer K, Siemionow W, et al. Robotic assistance in microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2000, 16(8):643-649.
8.	Kim YT, Kim SW, Jung YW. Robotic surgery in gynecologic field. Yonsei Med J, 2008, 49(6):886-890.
9.	Lunca S, Bouras G, Stanescu AC. Gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery. A current perspective. Rom J Gastroenterol, 2005, 14(4):385-391.
10.	Taleb C, Nectoux E, Liverneaux PA. Telemicrosurgery:a feasibility study in a rat model. Chir Main, 2008, 27(2-3):104-108.
11.	Taleb C, Nectoux E, Liverneaux P. Limb replantation with two robots:a feasibility study in a pig model. Microsurgery, 2009, 29(3):232-235.
12.	Liverneaux P, Nectoux E, Taleb C. The future of robotics in hand surgery. Chir Main, 2009, 28(5):278-285.
13.	Nectoux E, Taleb C, Liverneaux P. Nerve repair in telemicrosurgery:an experimental study. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2009, 25(4):261-265.
14.	Mantovani G, Liverneaux P, Garcia JC Jr, et al. Endoscopic exploration and repair of brachial plexus with telerobotic manipulation:a cadaver trial. J Neurosurg, 2011, 115(3):659-664.
15.	Porto de Melo PM, Garcia JC, Montero EF, et al. Feasibility of an endoscopic approach to the axillary nerve and the nerve to the long head of the triceps brachii with the help of the Da Vinci Robot. Chir Main, 2013, 4(5):206-209.
16.	Naito K, Facca S, Lequint T, et al. The Oberlin procedure for restoration of elbow flexion with the da Vinci robot:four cases. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 129(3):707-711.
17.	Miyamoto H, Leechavengvongs S, Atik T, et al. Nerve transfer to the deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps with the da Vinci robot:six cases. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2014, 23(7):375-380.
18.	Facca S, Hendriks S, Mantovani G, et al. Robot-assisted surgery of the shoulder girdle and brachial plexus. Semin Plast Surg, 2014, 28(1):39-44.
19.	Porto de Melo P, Miyamoto H, Serradori T, et al. Robotic phrenic nerve harvest:a feasibility study in a pig model. Chir Main, 2014, 33(5):356-360.
20.	Miyamoto H, Serradori T, Mikami Y, et al. Robotic intercostal nerve harvest:a feasibility study in a pig model. J Neurosurg, 2016, 124(1):264-268.
21.	Lequint T, Naito K, Chainge D, et al. Mini-invasive robot-assisted surgery of the brachial plexus:a case of intraneural perineurioma. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2012, 28(7):473-476.
22.	Tigan L, Miyamoto H, Hendriks S, et al. Interest of telemicrosurgery in peripheral nerve tumors:About a series of seven cases. Chir Main, 2014, 33(1):13-16.
23.	Garcia JC Jr, de Souza Montero EF. Endoscopic robotic decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Arthrosc Tech, 2014, 3(3):e383-e387.
24.	Rey D, Oderda M. The first case of robotic pudendal nerve decompression in pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(4):319-322.
25.	Panchulidze I, Berner S, Mantovani G, et al. Is haptic feedback necessary to microsurgical suturing? Comparative study of 9/0 and 10/0 knot tying operated by 24 surgeons. Hand Surg, 2011, 16(1):1-3.
26.	Koehn JK, Kuchenbecker KJ. Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(10):2970-2983.
27.	Meli L, Pacchierotti C, Prattichizzo D. Sensory subtraction in robot-assisted surgery:fingertip skin deformation feedback to ensure safety and improve transparency in bimanual haptic interaction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2014, 61(4):1318-1327.
28.	Zareinia K, Maddahi Y, Ng C, et al. Performance evaluation of haptic hand-controllers in a robot-assisted surgical system. Int J Med Robot, 2015.[Epub ahead of print].
29.	Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, et al. Hemodynamicconsequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum duringlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 1999, 13(4):376-381.
30.	Jacobs VR, Morrison JE Jr. The real intraabdominal pressure during laparoscopy:comparison of different insufflators. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14(1):103-107.
31.	Zobrist R, Aponte RL, Levin LS. Endoscopic access to the extremities:The principle of fascial clefts. J Orthop Trauma, 2002, 16(4):264-271.
32.	Saleh DB, Syed M, Kulendren D, et al. Plastic and reconstructive roboticmicrosurgery-a review of current practices. Ann Chir Plast Esthet, 2015, 60(4):305-312.

1. ?Garcia JC Jr, Lebailly F, Mantovani G, et al. Telerobotic manipulation of the brachial plexus. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2012, 28(7):491-494.
2. 劉亞飛, 王偉, Anod Mani Regmi, 等. 鎖骨骨折合并臂叢損傷的早期顯微外科治療. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2014, 28(11):1329-1331.
3. Modi P, Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR Jr. Robot-assisted cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2009, 9(3):500-505.
4. 杜詳民, 張永壽. 達芬奇手術機器人系統介紹及應用進展. 中國醫學裝備, 2011, 8(5):60-63.
5. 周寧新, 陳軍周, 劉全達, 等. "達芬奇"機器人普通外科手術180例:中國單中心報道. 中國普外基礎與臨床雜志, 2011, 18(7):698-704.
6. Le Roux PD, Das H, Esuenazi S, et al. Robot-assisted microsurgery:a feasibility study in the rat. Neurosurgery, 2001, 48(3):584-589.
7. Siemionow M, Ozer K, Siemionow W, et al. Robotic assistance in microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2000, 16(8):643-649.
8. Kim YT, Kim SW, Jung YW. Robotic surgery in gynecologic field. Yonsei Med J, 2008, 49(6):886-890.
9. Lunca S, Bouras G, Stanescu AC. Gastrointestinal robot-assisted surgery. A current perspective. Rom J Gastroenterol, 2005, 14(4):385-391.
10. Taleb C, Nectoux E, Liverneaux PA. Telemicrosurgery:a feasibility study in a rat model. Chir Main, 2008, 27(2-3):104-108.
11. Taleb C, Nectoux E, Liverneaux P. Limb replantation with two robots:a feasibility study in a pig model. Microsurgery, 2009, 29(3):232-235.
12. Liverneaux P, Nectoux E, Taleb C. The future of robotics in hand surgery. Chir Main, 2009, 28(5):278-285.
13. Nectoux E, Taleb C, Liverneaux P. Nerve repair in telemicrosurgery:an experimental study. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2009, 25(4):261-265.
14. Mantovani G, Liverneaux P, Garcia JC Jr, et al. Endoscopic exploration and repair of brachial plexus with telerobotic manipulation:a cadaver trial. J Neurosurg, 2011, 115(3):659-664.
15. Porto de Melo PM, Garcia JC, Montero EF, et al. Feasibility of an endoscopic approach to the axillary nerve and the nerve to the long head of the triceps brachii with the help of the Da Vinci Robot. Chir Main, 2013, 4(5):206-209.
16. Naito K, Facca S, Lequint T, et al. The Oberlin procedure for restoration of elbow flexion with the da Vinci robot:four cases. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 129(3):707-711.
17. Miyamoto H, Leechavengvongs S, Atik T, et al. Nerve transfer to the deltoid muscle using the nerve to the long head of the triceps with the da Vinci robot:six cases. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2014, 23(7):375-380.
18. Facca S, Hendriks S, Mantovani G, et al. Robot-assisted surgery of the shoulder girdle and brachial plexus. Semin Plast Surg, 2014, 28(1):39-44.
19. Porto de Melo P, Miyamoto H, Serradori T, et al. Robotic phrenic nerve harvest:a feasibility study in a pig model. Chir Main, 2014, 33(5):356-360.
20. Miyamoto H, Serradori T, Mikami Y, et al. Robotic intercostal nerve harvest:a feasibility study in a pig model. J Neurosurg, 2016, 124(1):264-268.
21. Lequint T, Naito K, Chainge D, et al. Mini-invasive robot-assisted surgery of the brachial plexus:a case of intraneural perineurioma. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2012, 28(7):473-476.
22. Tigan L, Miyamoto H, Hendriks S, et al. Interest of telemicrosurgery in peripheral nerve tumors:About a series of seven cases. Chir Main, 2014, 33(1):13-16.
23. Garcia JC Jr, de Souza Montero EF. Endoscopic robotic decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Arthrosc Tech, 2014, 3(3):e383-e387.
24. Rey D, Oderda M. The first case of robotic pudendal nerve decompression in pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(4):319-322.
25. Panchulidze I, Berner S, Mantovani G, et al. Is haptic feedback necessary to microsurgical suturing? Comparative study of 9/0 and 10/0 knot tying operated by 24 surgeons. Hand Surg, 2011, 16(1):1-3.
26. Koehn JK, Kuchenbecker KJ. Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(10):2970-2983.
27. Meli L, Pacchierotti C, Prattichizzo D. Sensory subtraction in robot-assisted surgery:fingertip skin deformation feedback to ensure safety and improve transparency in bimanual haptic interaction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2014, 61(4):1318-1327.
28. Zareinia K, Maddahi Y, Ng C, et al. Performance evaluation of haptic hand-controllers in a robot-assisted surgical system. Int J Med Robot, 2015.[Epub ahead of print].
29. Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, et al. Hemodynamicconsequences of high- and low-pressure capnoperitoneum duringlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 1999, 13(4):376-381.
30. Jacobs VR, Morrison JE Jr. The real intraabdominal pressure during laparoscopy:comparison of different insufflators. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14(1):103-107.
31. Zobrist R, Aponte RL, Levin LS. Endoscopic access to the extremities:The principle of fascial clefts. J Orthop Trauma, 2002, 16(4):264-271.
32. Saleh DB, Syed M, Kulendren D, et al. Plastic and reconstructive roboticmicrosurgery-a review of current practices. Ann Chir Plast Esthet, 2015, 60(4):305-312.

Previous Article
BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF POROUS POLY LACTIC ACID/BONE MATRIX GELATIN COMPOSITE BIOMATERIALS FOR BONE REPAIR
Next Article
關節鏡下治療距骨負重面骨樣骨瘤一例報告

Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery

RESEARCH PROGRESS OF PERIPHERAL NERVE SURGERY ASSISTED BY Da Vinci ROBOTIC SYSTEM

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content