Application progress of venous pressure monitoring in arteriovenous fistula_West China Medical Journal

Authors：

LI Xinhu ¹ ,  XU Yuankai ² , ZHANG Lihong ³

1. Department of Nephrology, Xinle City Hospital, Xinle, Hebei 050700, P. R. China;
2. Department of Nephrology, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310031, P. R. China;
3. Second Department of Nephrology, the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

XU Yuankai, Email: xyk19870309@126.com

Keywords：

Hemodialysis; arteriovenous fistula; venous pressure; monitoring

DOI：

10.7507/1002-0179.202006098

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Venous pressure monitoring is an important indicator for the arteriovenous fistula evaluation. Direct static venous pressure monitoring is recognized as the most accurate way of venous pressure monitoring, which is widely used in the functional monitoring, functional evaluation of arteriovenous fistula, the diagnosis of complications and the evaluation of surgical efficacy. Venous pressure monitoring has obvious advantages and disadvantages, so it is necessary to improve relevant knowledge to correctly guide clinical diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, the study of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula was summarized, in order to improve the understanding of the significance and clinical application of static venous pressure monitoring of arteriovenous fistula.

Citation： LI Xinhu, XU Yuankai, ZHANG Lihong. Application progress of venous pressure monitoring in arteriovenous fistula. West China Medical Journal, 2022, 37(7): 1094-1097. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.202006098 Copy

1.	Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis, 2020, 75(Suppl 2): S1-S164.
2.	Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C, et al. Editor’s choice - vascular access: 2018 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018, 55(6): 757-818.
3.	中國醫院協會血液凈化中心分會血管通路工作組. 中國血液透析用血管通路專家共識(第 2 版). 中國血液凈化, 2019, 18(6): 365-381.
4.	徐元愷, 張麗紅. 自體動靜脈內瘺并發癥的物理檢查應用. 中國血管外科雜志(電子版), 2016, 8(4): 259-261,266.
5.	Besarab A, Sullivan KL, Ross RP, et al. Utility of intra-access pressure monitoring in detecting and correcting venous outlet stenoses prior to thrombosis. Kidney Int, 1995, 47(5): 1364-1373.
6.	Wu CC, Hung HC, Kao TC, et al. High pulse pressure predicts primary arteriovenous fistula failure within 1 year. J Vasc Access, 2022, 8: 11297298211054797.
7.	?ilda? BM, K?seo?lu K?F. Discriminative role of brachial artery Doppler parameters in correlation with hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Clujul Med, 2017, 90(4): 407-410.
8.	Kumbar L, Karim J, Besarab A. Surveillance and monitoring of dialysis access. Int J Nephrol, 2012, 2012: 649735.
9.	King DH, Paulson WD, Al-Qaisi M, et al. Volume blood flow, static pressure ratio and venous conductance in native arterio-venous fistulae: three surveillance methods compared. J Vasc Access, 2015, 16(3): 211-217.
10.	Arif A, Anil KA, Alexander SY, et al. Interventional Nephrology. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012.
11.	Abreu R, Rioja S, Vallespin J, et al. Predictors of early failure and secondary patency in native arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Int Angiol, 2018, 37(4): 310-314.
12.	Tang CY, Zhu CP, Wang RP, et al. Effect of blood pump flow and arteriovenous fistula blood flow on the blood pressure and cardiac function in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Ther Apher Dial, 2019, 23(6): 556-561.
13.	Ravani P, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ, et al. Preemptive correction of arteriovenous access stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis, 2016, 67(3): 446-460.
14.	Shetty A, Whittier WL. Does regular surveillance improve the long-term survival of arteriovenous fistulas?. Int J Nephrol, 2012, 2012: 539608.
15.	Agishi T, Kaneko I, Kumagai E, et al. Continuous blood pressure monitoring during hemodialysis. Artif Organs, 1979, 3(3): 237-240.
16.	Gordon DH, Glanz S, Butt KM, et al. Treatment of stenotic lesions in dialysis access fistulas and shunts by transluminal angioplasty. Radiology, 1982, 143(1): 53-58.
17.	Nakane K, Shinzato T, Maeda K. Continuous measurement of pressure in internal arteriovenous fistulae and prevention of symptomatic hypotension during hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans, 1991, 37(3): M232-M234.
18.	Besarab A, Moritz M, Sullivan K, et al. Venous access pressures and the detection of intra-access stenosis. ASAIO J, 1992, 38(3): M519-M523.
19.	Glanz S, Gordon DH, Butt KM, et al. The role of percutaneous angioplasty in the management of chronic hemodialysis fistulas. Ann Surg, 1987, 206(6): 777-781.
20.	Campos RP, Chula DC, Perreto S, et al. Accuracy of physical examination and intra-access pressure in the detection of stenosis in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Semin Dial, 2008, 21(3): 269-273.
21.	Glanz S, Gordon D, Butt KM, et al. Dialysis access fistulas: treatment of stenoses by transluminal angioplasty. Radiology, 1984, 152(3): 637-642.
22.	Lichtman AD. “Arterialization” of the central venous pressure waveform from a peripheral arteriovenous fistula. Anesthesiology, 2020, 132(2): 373.
23.	Ash SR, Dhamija R, Zaroura MY, et al. The StenTec gauge for measuring static intra-access pressure ratio (P_{Ia Ratio}) of fistulas and grafts. Semin Dial, 2012, 25(4): 474-481.
24.	Koirala N, Anvari E, McLennan G. Monitoring and surveillance of hemodialysis access. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2016, 33(1): 25-30.
25.	Smits JH, van der Linden J, Hagen EC, et al. Graft surveillance: venous pressure, access flow, or the combination?. Kidney Int, 2001, 59(4): 1551-1558.
26.	徐元愷, 趙藝欣, 張文云, 等. 自體動靜脈內瘺觸診與血流量的對應關系分析. 中國血液凈化, 2016, 15(11): 624-627.
27.	徐元愷, 甄景琴, 張文云, 等. 內瘺靜脈最小內徑可作為判斷自體動靜脈內瘺狹窄的指標. 中華腎臟病雜志, 2017, 33(3): 187-190.
28.	Beathard GA, Jennings WC, Wasse H, et al. ASDIN white paper: management of cephalic arch stenosis endorsed by the American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology. J Vasc Access, 2021, 14: 11297298211033519.
29.	Kim SM, Yoon KW, Woo SY, et al. Treatment strategies for cephalic arch stenosis in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula. Ann Vasc Surg, 2019, 54: 248-253.

1. Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis, 2020, 75(Suppl 2): S1-S164.
2. Schmidli J, Widmer MK, Basile C, et al. Editor’s choice - vascular access: 2018 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018, 55(6): 757-818.
3. 中國醫院協會血液凈化中心分會血管通路工作組. 中國血液透析用血管通路專家共識(第 2 版). 中國血液凈化, 2019, 18(6): 365-381.
4. 徐元愷, 張麗紅. 自體動靜脈內瘺并發癥的物理檢查應用. 中國血管外科雜志(電子版), 2016, 8(4): 259-261,266.
5. Besarab A, Sullivan KL, Ross RP, et al. Utility of intra-access pressure monitoring in detecting and correcting venous outlet stenoses prior to thrombosis. Kidney Int, 1995, 47(5): 1364-1373.
6. Wu CC, Hung HC, Kao TC, et al. High pulse pressure predicts primary arteriovenous fistula failure within 1 year. J Vasc Access, 2022, 8: 11297298211054797.
7. ?ilda? BM, K?seo?lu K?F. Discriminative role of brachial artery Doppler parameters in correlation with hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Clujul Med, 2017, 90(4): 407-410.
8. Kumbar L, Karim J, Besarab A. Surveillance and monitoring of dialysis access. Int J Nephrol, 2012, 2012: 649735.
9. King DH, Paulson WD, Al-Qaisi M, et al. Volume blood flow, static pressure ratio and venous conductance in native arterio-venous fistulae: three surveillance methods compared. J Vasc Access, 2015, 16(3): 211-217.
10. Arif A, Anil KA, Alexander SY, et al. Interventional Nephrology. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2012.
11. Abreu R, Rioja S, Vallespin J, et al. Predictors of early failure and secondary patency in native arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Int Angiol, 2018, 37(4): 310-314.
12. Tang CY, Zhu CP, Wang RP, et al. Effect of blood pump flow and arteriovenous fistula blood flow on the blood pressure and cardiac function in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Ther Apher Dial, 2019, 23(6): 556-561.
13. Ravani P, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ, et al. Preemptive correction of arteriovenous access stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis, 2016, 67(3): 446-460.
14. Shetty A, Whittier WL. Does regular surveillance improve the long-term survival of arteriovenous fistulas?. Int J Nephrol, 2012, 2012: 539608.
15. Agishi T, Kaneko I, Kumagai E, et al. Continuous blood pressure monitoring during hemodialysis. Artif Organs, 1979, 3(3): 237-240.
16. Gordon DH, Glanz S, Butt KM, et al. Treatment of stenotic lesions in dialysis access fistulas and shunts by transluminal angioplasty. Radiology, 1982, 143(1): 53-58.
17. Nakane K, Shinzato T, Maeda K. Continuous measurement of pressure in internal arteriovenous fistulae and prevention of symptomatic hypotension during hemodialysis. ASAIO Trans, 1991, 37(3): M232-M234.
18. Besarab A, Moritz M, Sullivan K, et al. Venous access pressures and the detection of intra-access stenosis. ASAIO J, 1992, 38(3): M519-M523.
19. Glanz S, Gordon DH, Butt KM, et al. The role of percutaneous angioplasty in the management of chronic hemodialysis fistulas. Ann Surg, 1987, 206(6): 777-781.
20. Campos RP, Chula DC, Perreto S, et al. Accuracy of physical examination and intra-access pressure in the detection of stenosis in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula. Semin Dial, 2008, 21(3): 269-273.
21. Glanz S, Gordon D, Butt KM, et al. Dialysis access fistulas: treatment of stenoses by transluminal angioplasty. Radiology, 1984, 152(3): 637-642.
22. Lichtman AD. “Arterialization” of the central venous pressure waveform from a peripheral arteriovenous fistula. Anesthesiology, 2020, 132(2): 373.
23. Ash SR, Dhamija R, Zaroura MY, et al. The StenTec gauge for measuring static intra-access pressure ratio (P_{Ia Ratio}) of fistulas and grafts. Semin Dial, 2012, 25(4): 474-481.
24. Koirala N, Anvari E, McLennan G. Monitoring and surveillance of hemodialysis access. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2016, 33(1): 25-30.
25. Smits JH, van der Linden J, Hagen EC, et al. Graft surveillance: venous pressure, access flow, or the combination?. Kidney Int, 2001, 59(4): 1551-1558.
26. 徐元愷, 趙藝欣, 張文云, 等. 自體動靜脈內瘺觸診與血流量的對應關系分析. 中國血液凈化, 2016, 15(11): 624-627.
27. 徐元愷, 甄景琴, 張文云, 等. 內瘺靜脈最小內徑可作為判斷自體動靜脈內瘺狹窄的指標. 中華腎臟病雜志, 2017, 33(3): 187-190.
28. Beathard GA, Jennings WC, Wasse H, et al. ASDIN white paper: management of cephalic arch stenosis endorsed by the American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology. J Vasc Access, 2021, 14: 11297298211033519.
29. Kim SM, Yoon KW, Woo SY, et al. Treatment strategies for cephalic arch stenosis in patients with brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula. Ann Vasc Surg, 2019, 54: 248-253.

West China Medical Journal

Application progress of venous pressure monitoring in arteriovenous fistula

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content