The Influence of Different Concentrations of Iodinated Contrast Agent on Image Quality of Galactography_West China Medical Journal

Authors：

 ZhaoJin ,  HuangLin , YuanYuan

Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

HuangLin, Email: hx_linhuang@sina.com

Keywords：

Digital mammography; Galactography; Concentration of non-ionic iodinated contrast agent

DOI：

10.7507/1002-0179.201600339

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To explore the influence of different concentrations of iodinated contrast agent on image quality of galactography. Methods Between June 2008 and October 2009, 50 non-pregnancy and non-lactation patients with mammary papilla discharge underwent breast galactography with digital mammography. All the patients' left breasts were in group L, and right breasts were in group R. The iohexol concentration of iopamidol injection was 370 mg/mL in group L and 300 mg/mL in group R. The image quality and the evaluation of average density of the two groups was analyzed and compared. Results The image quality score of group L and R was 2.8±0.2 (P>0.05). The mean density of main duct of breast axial view in two groups was (4 020.25±96.26) and (3 984.75±117.67) HU, respectively; the mean density of the lateral oblique view was (4 067.13±24.69) and (3 971.25±167.32) HU, respectively; the mean density of the lateral view was (4 058.88±52.07) and (4 034.75±67.54) HU, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion No obvious difference between the two concentrations of non-ionic iodinated contrast agents (300 and 370 mg/mL) in galactography diagnosis is found.

Citation： ZhaoJin, HuangLin, YuanYuan. The Influence of Different Concentrations of Iodinated Contrast Agent on Image Quality of Galactography. West China Medical Journal, 2016, 31(7): 1247-1250. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201600339 Copy

1.	張濱, 劉垚, 單中輝. 乳頭溢液的診斷及臨床意義[J]. 中國醫師進修雜志, 2006, 29(26):8-9.
2.	馬榕. 乳管造影在乳頭溢液疾病診治中的作用[J]. 中國實用外科雜志, 2005, 25(2):75-76.
3.	劉春萍, 黃韜. 病理性乳頭溢液的診斷進展[J]. 臨床外科雜志, 2005, 13(3):186-188.
4.	陳韻岱, 陳紀言, 傅國勝, 等. 碘對比劑血管造影應用相關不良反應中國專家共識[J]. 中國介入心臟病學雜志, 2014, 22(6):341-348.
5.	Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, et al. Cardiac angiography in renally impaired patients (CARE) study:a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Circulation, 2007, 115(25):3189-3196.
6.	Chen Y, Hu S, Liu Y, et al. Renal tolerability of iopromide and iodixanol in 562 renally impaired patients undergoing cardiac catheterization:the DIRECT study[J]. Eur Intervention, 2012, 8(7):830-838.
7.	曾莉, 努爾別克, 李先軍, 等. 乳腺導管造影技術在乳頭溢液性疾病檢查中的質量控制[J]. 中華放射學雜志, 2009, 43(11):1219-1221.
8.	張黎峰, 茅群霞, 王獻蜜, 等. 我國6省市育齡婦女乳腺疾病流行狀況調查[J]. 中國計劃生育學雜志, 2014, 22(10):658-660, 665.
9.	Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, et al. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2013, 132(5):1133-1145.
10.	張惠霞, 韓保衛, 黃永紅. 乳腺導管造影的X線分析及臨床應用[J]. 實用放射學雜志, 2007, 23(9):1242-1244.
11.	黃永紅, 周會行. 乳腺導管造影X線診斷498例分析[J]. 現代醫用影像學, 2005, 14(6):260.
12.	陳少華, 方景華, 馮錦霞, 等. 選擇性乳腺導管造影技術的質量控制[J]. 實用醫學雜志, 2006, 22(12):1398-1399.
13.	孫蔚明, 杜曄. 非離子型造影劑致腎損害的臨床分析[J]. 中國醫學影像學雜志, 2005, 13(4):284-287.
14.	Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105(19):2259-2264.
15.	許小曼. 非離子型造影劑對CT受檢者血液流變學指標的影響[J]. 微循環學雜志, 2011, 21(1):28-29.
16.	Seeliger E, Flemming B, Wronski T, et al. Viscosity of contrast media perturbs renal hemodynamics[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007, 18(11):2912-2920.

1. 張濱, 劉垚, 單中輝. 乳頭溢液的診斷及臨床意義[J]. 中國醫師進修雜志, 2006, 29(26):8-9.
2. 馬榕. 乳管造影在乳頭溢液疾病診治中的作用[J]. 中國實用外科雜志, 2005, 25(2):75-76.
3. 劉春萍, 黃韜. 病理性乳頭溢液的診斷進展[J]. 臨床外科雜志, 2005, 13(3):186-188.
4. 陳韻岱, 陳紀言, 傅國勝, 等. 碘對比劑血管造影應用相關不良反應中國專家共識[J]. 中國介入心臟病學雜志, 2014, 22(6):341-348.
5. Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, et al. Cardiac angiography in renally impaired patients (CARE) study:a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease[J]. Circulation, 2007, 115(25):3189-3196.
6. Chen Y, Hu S, Liu Y, et al. Renal tolerability of iopromide and iodixanol in 562 renally impaired patients undergoing cardiac catheterization:the DIRECT study[J]. Eur Intervention, 2012, 8(7):830-838.
7. 曾莉, 努爾別克, 李先軍, 等. 乳腺導管造影技術在乳頭溢液性疾病檢查中的質量控制[J]. 中華放射學雜志, 2009, 43(11):1219-1221.
8. 張黎峰, 茅群霞, 王獻蜜, 等. 我國6省市育齡婦女乳腺疾病流行狀況調查[J]. 中國計劃生育學雜志, 2014, 22(10):658-660, 665.
9. Bray F, Ren JS, Masuyer E, et al. Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2013, 132(5):1133-1145.
10. 張惠霞, 韓保衛, 黃永紅. 乳腺導管造影的X線分析及臨床應用[J]. 實用放射學雜志, 2007, 23(9):1242-1244.
11. 黃永紅, 周會行. 乳腺導管造影X線診斷498例分析[J]. 現代醫用影像學, 2005, 14(6):260.
12. 陳少華, 方景華, 馮錦霞, 等. 選擇性乳腺導管造影技術的質量控制[J]. 實用醫學雜志, 2006, 22(12):1398-1399.
13. 孫蔚明, 杜曄. 非離子型造影劑致腎損害的臨床分析[J]. 中國醫學影像學雜志, 2005, 13(4):284-287.
14. Rihal CS, Textor SC, Grill DE, et al. Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Circulation, 2002, 105(19):2259-2264.
15. 許小曼. 非離子型造影劑對CT受檢者血液流變學指標的影響[J]. 微循環學雜志, 2011, 21(1):28-29.
16. Seeliger E, Flemming B, Wronski T, et al. Viscosity of contrast media perturbs renal hemodynamics[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007, 18(11):2912-2920.

West China Medical Journal

The Influence of Different Concentrations of Iodinated Contrast Agent on Image Quality of Galactography

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content